Let's Hear It For Sugar Ray Leonard.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by young griffo, Jul 1, 2007.


  1. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005

    Who would that someone be and why won't you mention his name?
     
  2. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    how could Hagler have lost the first four rounds? You're being very generous to leonard when the most he did was make the first and third even. And you can't give him round seven because throwing combinations after the bell does not tip the scales,, at least not legally when it comes to scoring. That's what some guy did-he gave it to leonard because he got in 3 or 4 after the bell and pretended he didn't hear the bell, like Leonard.

    Why does leonard always need so much help in fights?
     
  3. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,559
    Dec 18, 2004
    Hagler was ****. He come out all confused not knowing which stance to fight in, Leonard was giving him what Mike Colbert had done for 11 rounds a decade earlier. Hagler looked like he wanted Leonard's autograph in the first few rounds. The stupid star-struck baldy *******. :yep
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,648
    44,072
    Apr 27, 2005
    Because anyone that frequents here with any regularity will know exactly what he is talking about.

    Yet another dinner classic actually

    :lol:
     
  5. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,559
    Dec 18, 2004
    Recently I've noticed a link between those that had Leonard ahead vs Hearns and those that had Hagler in front vs Ray- and vice-versa.


    Hugh McIlvanney: Leonard ahead, Hagler ahead.
    Associated Press: Leonard ahead, Hagler ahead.
    Ring magazizne: Hearns ahead, Leonard ahead.
    Graham Houston, Boxing News. Hearns ahead, Leonard ahead.
    KO mag: Hearns ahead, leonard ahead.
    Harry Mullan, Boxing News, Leonard ahead, Hagler ahead.


    MDWC: Hearns ahead, Leonard ahead. :good


    It seems that shading rounds only applies when Leonard loses them with some people.
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,648
    44,072
    Apr 27, 2005
    Interesting, both The Ring and KO had Leonard ahead. Well hardly surprising really. I think it was Big Book of Boxing who also had Leonard winning, by a big margin. I've lost count of the times Rooster has held up the esteemed rankings of both regarding fighter of the year etc. Looks like he picks and chooses just what he wants to publicise

    :lol:
     
  7. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    "What Mike Colbert had done for 11 rounds" As if you watched the fight yourself. I get it. HaHa.

    You just told us you were eight yrs. when you saw Leonard-Hearns so that makes you 3 or 4 when you watched Hagler-Colbert?

    Now we all know you didn't see it so stop letting on like you did liar. If you're lucky you once watched the highlights but I don't think so because I live in the States and I haven't seen it. And that's no lie.

    Unlike yourself, the rest of us (except for John Thomas) don't describe fights we didn't see ourselves and don't pretend to. If you're looking ways to smear a fighter, would you please do so in legitimate fashion the way I do on a day to say basis?

    Thank you.
     
  8. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    i'm sick of these damn lies polluting the forms saying whatever they want and inventing stories on the spot.

    Conteh, answer me this: why would any one from the world of boxing ask some low-life nobody, with no connections, off of the streets to come in and eat with them? They're not exactly the generous type from what I hear.

    The guy who used to post here a while back, Hasscup, I can believe but he was quick to show me evidence and also has the kind of connections needed in this business but you're no one of importance so why should I believe you?
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,648
    44,072
    Apr 27, 2005
    You're just soooo sexy when trying to play the innocent, rational and sane role reddy.

    :lol:
     
  10. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    i imagine it's hard to recall details from a fight when you're 3 years old. I love the front he puts on about "hagler fell behind just like in the Colbert fight"

    He's hilarious.
     
  11. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    "He fell behind to leonard the way he did with Colbert a decade earlier"

    What'll he say next?
     
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,648
    44,072
    Apr 27, 2005

    Hmmmmm, possibly that you are an absolute dickhead.

    :lol:
     
  13. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,648
    44,072
    Apr 27, 2005
    He's hilarious says the undisputed Village Idiot of ESB

    :rofl
     
  14. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005
    Well, he does act like an eight year old so that wouldn't surprise anyone here.
    he usually pops off like an imbecile on other people but quiets down once I come out. You don't have much to say either. I'd say I gave you both a good beating this morning. :!:
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,648
    44,072
    Apr 27, 2005
    I'd say the only thing you've been beating this morning is about 3 inches long and points in the direction of your SRL poster wall.

    8===D~~~~ SRL poster