how could Hagler have lost the first four rounds? You're being very generous to leonard when the most he did was make the first and third even. And you can't give him round seven because throwing combinations after the bell does not tip the scales,, at least not legally when it comes to scoring. That's what some guy did-he gave it to leonard because he got in 3 or 4 after the bell and pretended he didn't hear the bell, like Leonard. Why does leonard always need so much help in fights?
Hagler was ****. He come out all confused not knowing which stance to fight in, Leonard was giving him what Mike Colbert had done for 11 rounds a decade earlier. Hagler looked like he wanted Leonard's autograph in the first few rounds. The stupid star-struck baldy *******. :yep
Because anyone that frequents here with any regularity will know exactly what he is talking about. Yet another dinner classic actually
Recently I've noticed a link between those that had Leonard ahead vs Hearns and those that had Hagler in front vs Ray- and vice-versa. Hugh McIlvanney: Leonard ahead, Hagler ahead. Associated Press: Leonard ahead, Hagler ahead. Ring magazizne: Hearns ahead, Leonard ahead. Graham Houston, Boxing News. Hearns ahead, Leonard ahead. KO mag: Hearns ahead, leonard ahead. Harry Mullan, Boxing News, Leonard ahead, Hagler ahead. MDWC: Hearns ahead, Leonard ahead. :good It seems that shading rounds only applies when Leonard loses them with some people.
Interesting, both The Ring and KO had Leonard ahead. Well hardly surprising really. I think it was Big Book of Boxing who also had Leonard winning, by a big margin. I've lost count of the times Rooster has held up the esteemed rankings of both regarding fighter of the year etc. Looks like he picks and chooses just what he wants to publicise
"What Mike Colbert had done for 11 rounds" As if you watched the fight yourself. I get it. HaHa. You just told us you were eight yrs. when you saw Leonard-Hearns so that makes you 3 or 4 when you watched Hagler-Colbert? Now we all know you didn't see it so stop letting on like you did liar. If you're lucky you once watched the highlights but I don't think so because I live in the States and I haven't seen it. And that's no lie. Unlike yourself, the rest of us (except for John Thomas) don't describe fights we didn't see ourselves and don't pretend to. If you're looking ways to smear a fighter, would you please do so in legitimate fashion the way I do on a day to say basis? Thank you.
i'm sick of these damn lies polluting the forms saying whatever they want and inventing stories on the spot. Conteh, answer me this: why would any one from the world of boxing ask some low-life nobody, with no connections, off of the streets to come in and eat with them? They're not exactly the generous type from what I hear. The guy who used to post here a while back, Hasscup, I can believe but he was quick to show me evidence and also has the kind of connections needed in this business but you're no one of importance so why should I believe you?
i imagine it's hard to recall details from a fight when you're 3 years old. I love the front he puts on about "hagler fell behind just like in the Colbert fight" He's hilarious.
Well, he does act like an eight year old so that wouldn't surprise anyone here. he usually pops off like an imbecile on other people but quiets down once I come out. You don't have much to say either. I'd say I gave you both a good beating this morning. :!:
I'd say the only thing you've been beating this morning is about 3 inches long and points in the direction of your SRL poster wall. 8===D~~~~ SRL poster