Let's put an end to the BULL**** about the contract: Wlad/Haye

:good
EXACTLY:hi:

 

So in the case of haye one fight and maybe now two have fallen apart from over 20 fights sounds like a big problem to me, if somthing is happening that often:roll:

 

look at what happened when he moved up to HW... it was like a reloving door of who Haye was going to fight... yet EVERY TIME it didnt pan out...there was Haye blaming the other side:hey

 

I don't see the problem in a rematch clause with Wlad and a clause that GUARANTEES Haye a fight against Vitali. He would lose the IBF title because of not meeting the mandatory, but would unify the WBO with the WBC and beat the two best heavies in the world if he were to win all three fights, all the while making millions. Sorry, don't see the complaint here.

If anyone should be pissed it is Wlad's mandatory challengers in Povetkin, Arreola and Dimitrenko.

 

Vitali wanted to fight Haye, but has to fight Gomez who is his mandatory.

Ask Herbie Hide about Haye.

 

Nah. A contract has to be worked out. That is obvious to us all. But a champion's heart is what it is. Wladimir's terms show some of his character (or what have you) and so would Haye's if he were in the driver's seat.

 

Klitschkos are the best heavyweight in the entire world, by far. They have nothing to fear by fighting Haye. Compare Vitali and Vlad's opponents to Haye's, no comparision.

 

Haye's fans a truly delusional.

 

First off both the KLITS have MANDATORY fights they MUST TAKE OR LOSE THEIR BELTS. So there IS NO WAY that china chinned limey ***** HAYE can fight one then the other. Why would either Klit risk getting a belt stripped just to fight a blown up CW. David Haye is a pompous ass and a ****ing jerk. **** him

 

Haye is trying to make hay while the sun shines.

 

:good
the whole team was out of there league and disrespectful :hey:good