Let's rank the Cubans ... top 10 list!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cuban Bon Bon, Nov 24, 2011.


  1. Cuban Bon Bon

    Cuban Bon Bon Proverbs 9:10 Full Member

    2,334
    0
    Jul 4, 2011
    Good order, I didn't mentioned Salinas and Santana both good solid prospects.
     
  2. Cuban Bon Bon

    Cuban Bon Bon Proverbs 9:10 Full Member

    2,334
    0
    Jul 4, 2011
     
  3. garfios

    garfios Dark Lord Full Member

    7,465
    21
    Feb 13, 2010
    What they did back in the amateurs doesn't count anymore neither 2 1/2 minutes of sharpness that is a loser excuse, he was not in shape and paid for it, if we are rating these Cubans for their accomplishments in the pro. then Gamboa and Hernandez should b rank 1 and 2, then Rigondeaux and the rest, IMO.
     
  4. garfios

    garfios Dark Lord Full Member

    7,465
    21
    Feb 13, 2010
    Lara was luckier than Franco against Molina, anyone can have a bad night....
     
  5. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    Hernandez is way more proven then Perez.
     
  6. garfios

    garfios Dark Lord Full Member

    7,465
    21
    Feb 13, 2010
    Yes he is that's why I put him at #2, after all amateur doesn't count anymore...
     
  7. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Lara is definitely above Solis.
     
  8. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    14,484
    3
    Oct 12, 2010
    Lara needs to be ranked above Solis :deal
     
  9. Cuban Bon Bon

    Cuban Bon Bon Proverbs 9:10 Full Member

    2,334
    0
    Jul 4, 2011
    Why are you saying that Solis was not in shape? He lost about 20 pounds and looked in great physical shape to me. I think he got injured cause he was overweight for such a long time and his knee couldn't take it.

    I don't agree with you, the amateur experience does count. That's where you learn your fundamentals and your technique. You can't say that if a boxer has 300 amateur bouts that he doesn't have anything. Almost all of the great pros have had a good amateur career so the amateur experience does count!
     
  10. Cuban Bon Bon

    Cuban Bon Bon Proverbs 9:10 Full Member

    2,334
    0
    Jul 4, 2011
    No, Solis is better skilled and is a much better boxer allround. Believe it or not, Lara is a very one dimensional boxer. Yes he is very good ( at what he does ) but Solis is better in every department. The only thing that Lara has over Solis is age and dedication. ;)
     
  11. funkykoval

    funkykoval Active Member Full Member

    1,002
    50
    Jan 20, 2008
    is there an internet on Cuba ? :huh
     
  12. Kid Cubano

    Kid Cubano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,086
    10
    Aug 8, 2004
    kind of agree with this one:good
     
  13. garfios

    garfios Dark Lord Full Member

    7,465
    21
    Feb 13, 2010
    Bon Bon I agreed that the amateur experience counts, I never say it didn't, but once they jump to the pro the amateur accomplishments mean nothing, that is why I ranked Gamboa and Hernandez higher than Solis and Rigondeaux, read again and you will not find anything against experience
     
  14. Malden

    Malden 006 Full Member

    14,631
    1
    Aug 18, 2011
    Love them Cubans (No manilow)
     
  15. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    Good post. Abril might also deserve inclusion. His ceiling is not as high as most of these, and has some losses, but has an interim belt and his losses are not bad. I'd put Franco lower, maybe replace him with Despaigne. Franco is a fighter, and seems to have a solid chin, but I think needs a different style with his lack of power. I also don't think he would have done any better against Russell Jr than Despaigne did against Sillakh.