Let's Settle This Once and For All: Pacquaio vs Hamed

The sad fact is we can't really settle this once and for all . . . because the fight won't ever happen.

All we can get is the number of who picks who. :yep

 

when he fought oscar larios, he was throwing combinations on different angles and showed some lateral movement which proved that he really was evolving from a come-forward slugger to a multi-dimensional boxer (although some may argue because larios is slow and was an easy target for pac)

i was really convinced that he could really box after watching pac-mab 2..

with the right game plan provided by roach and pac's patience.. he can even decision naseem hamed if he wants to..


pac by ko or ud

 

hammed

if they would have fought back when hammed was at 122, hammed was the more experienced fighter of the two

 

Hi people!

My first post!

Speed and power kills!

It's Pacquiao!

 

good for you noob..:yep

:good

 

Pac by KO

 

Any more excited you might risk a hearttack.




Pac wins in an exciting fight.

 

Pac because he can put together killer combos when Hamed throws one punch at a time.

 

Pac by KO

 

morrissey, you picked hamed when you started this thread several months ago, did you change your pick now?

 

Speed + Power = pacman

I choose Pacman by KO/UD

 

This poll only proves that theres more Pac fans here than Hamed fans (not that shocking when you consider that this is a pro pac site)

 

I think naz prime for prime takes this fight, pacman loves to tear it up with people, you just don't want to do that with naz, he had a freak amount of power, you need to box naz at range not slug it out with him in a firefight