Let's Settle This Once and For All: Pacquaio vs Hamed

Let's judge Pacman after his fight with JMM. He is supposed to be in his prime now. Are telling us that Pacman doesn't have the power to stop Hamed with his punch and hence needs to box? Pac himself has a freak amount of power. Just look what happened at the iron-chinned Mexican warriors.

 

or that maybe a lot of people just think he'd win over hamed.

 

Pac and Naz in 2009 at lightweight..

 

Depends whether it was at & 122 or 126.

 

I don't mean to be rude, but anyone who thinks any version of Naseem Hamed could beat the best version of Manny Pacquiao knows NOTHING about boxing. I'm not responding on this thread again, this should be ****ing obvious. It's laughable to be honest.

 

If youre saying Pac post 04 with his improving defense,+ all round boxing ability beats a Prime Naz then thats hard to argue with, But a pre 04 pac would be in a hell of a lot of trouble with prime naz, if pac engaged him in a brawl coming straight at naz, Bad Bad news.

To write ANY version of Naz wouldnt beat the BEST version of Pac may be true, but ANY version of Pac may not beat the BEST version of Naz.

 

Very true. would have been a classic.

 

pac by KO, the thread said prime for prime. prime pac is the more skillfull pac post 2005. that pac would massacre hamed.

pre-2005 pac, the one that got a draw with marquez, its 50/50

 

the best version of hamed will not beat the best version of pac.

 

Good decision, as you've just shown how embarrassingly biased you are regarding Hamed on the other thread.

 

I'm not biased at all, I simply think this is a mismatch and that Hamed is very overrated. Is having a strong opinion backed up with reasoning "bias"??

 

:yep