Let's Settle This Once and For All: Pacquaio vs Hamed

The voting should be over by now . . . so this gets settled in everybodies dreams.

. . . there's no way to settle a "dream match" once and for all . . . because unexpected things always happens in the ring.

 

122lbs on down hamed would take this in a hard fought battle, in his prime he was just as fast and probably hit harder than pacman. at 126 on up, it's all pacquiao, hamed looked way too flabby and looked like a bloated bantamweight and was starting to get lazy, while pacman was only getting faster, smarter, and stronger

 

Easy. Pac by KO. Too fast. I would love to see Hamed doing his bull**** vs PAC. He would get put to sleep. Pac is too fast he would catch him, often. Plus he has the power.

PAC by KO.

 

Pac wins most of the time but his style gives Hamed a puncher's chance.

 

Still, IMO, Hamed beats Pac, in a close terrific potential FOTY.

 

Thats my view.

 

Intense pressure? Barrera was not putting on intense pressure that night. Hamed showed that night he couldn't deal with a smart technician, he'd have a better time with a wide open 126lb Manny Pacquiao, in my opinion.

 

By the time Naz faced MAB he had lost his hunger and was done, Naz in his prime was near unstoppable, he used to KO fighters for fun.

Naz would have KO Pacman in 5 rounds, out cold (prime on prime)

 

:good

 

i must sound like a broken record but so does ESB sometimes. Pac is ****ing underrated.

 

Don't get twisted.

It is not a coincidence that once Hamed stepped up to elite level he lost, and never returned. He was knocking out C levels for fun, and still getting tagged in the process.

 

Pac by murder.

 

Exactly. How does KOing C-level bums equal KOing Pac?

 

For most of the morons on ESB Pac is pretty much a C level bum with fast hands, but not as fast as Gamboa or Zab Judah