I just posted this in the general forum, and realized, I'd have better served my own interests posting it here. So here it is again, the very same post. Curious to hear your thoughts! :cheers Where do you rank him? Top 5? Top 10? How do you think he'd have performed against ATGs who you rank ahead of him? What do you think Larry's best and worst performances were? What fight should Larry have made happen that would have done the most for his legacy? Thoughts?
> Top 5 (#3). > Head to head he'd be extremely formidable, I'd say on a par with Ali here. Outside that: Liston, Lewis, Louis and Frazier would be the next closest. All-time, I'd only have Louis and Ali ahead. > Best performance: Norton I, Cooney or Shavers I. Worst performance: the Bey fight, Spinks I or Holyfield (harsh, maybe) > Greg Page or a Witherspoon rematch.
top 3 I'd make him an under dog to Louis and Ali, whom i rate ahead of him tough he has a solid chance
We've gone through this topic on quite a few occasions in the classic forum, but here's my $0.02. Holmes in my opinion, is either drastically over rated by some, or extremely under rated by others. Some fans/experts have him rated at #3 ( too high ), while others have him around #10 ( too low ). Seldomly does anyone take a balanced approach when giving him a rating. I think Holmes deserves to be ranked somewhere between #4 to #6 on an all time great list. The fact, that he had the second highest number of title defenses, topped only by Joe Louis, and the second best undefeated win streak, bested only by Rocky Marciano, earns him a place around or near the top 5. However, the fact that he defended his title against a considerable amount of second raters, as well as prospects with too few fights, makes it very hard to place him in the same category as a Muhammad Ali. I couldn't tell you which win was his absolute best, but I can provide a small list of fights that I feel were noteworthy of mention. Both Shavers fights along with his wins over Norton, Cooney, Witherspoon and Mercer were all quality wins over good fighters. I would list his first meeting with Michael Spinks as being the worst performance of his career, omitting his later defeats to Tyson, Holyfield and Mccall given that these came at a rather advanced stage in his career. Head to head, I think he would have been a very formidable opponent for just about any all time great, when in his prime.
1. Ali 2. Louis 3. Lewis 4. Johnson 5. Holmes 6. Marciano 7. Dempsey 8. Liston 9. Frazier 10. Jeffries 11. Holyfield 12. Foreman 13. Wills 14. Tyson 15. Langford 16. Charles 17. Walcott 18. Patterson 19. Corbett 20. Tunney 21. Schmeling 22. McVey 23. Bowe 24. Fitzsimmons 25. Baer
Holmes would be a difficult night's work for anyone. Basically, if a guy is on your top 10/12 list he's gonna be a handful even for anyone on that list. I pick most of my top ten to beat Holmes - I have him at #9 - but that's not to say that that is how it would go on any given night. Holmes could beat anyone apart from Ali and Liston, who would always do him in my view. The only guy I have above him who I think he could beat would be Johnson and possibly Jeffries. I would pick Louis, Lewis, Frazier, Hollyfield, all above him for me, to beat him in close ones.
Strangely enough, I think prime Holmes matches up extremely well against any version of Ali or Liston.
Ali outsrips Holmes in every single area aside from technique and left uppercut, so i've always struggled to see Holmes beating Ali. Why do you see it otherwise? Liston is Holmes' worst nightmare IMO. A guy who can out-jab him and take to land because of the power/chin deficiency that Holmes suffers.
He's not going to outbox or impress the judges against Ali. He has to be strong on the offense and go after Ali (prime). Early Ali is simply too fast - Later Ali's chin would allow him to trade successfully with Holmes; win enough close rounds to take a split decision. Liston just bulls Holmes around and takes him out of his comfort zone. People only really know the 60's Liston - Liston, circa 1958, was EVERY Heavyweight's worst nightmare.
I have Larry at #2, maybe 3. He's very underrated and perhaps was the smartest heavyweight I've ever seen in the ring (yes, smarter than Ali). Larry did all the things that one needed to be successful and had one of the sweetest jabs the sport's ever seen.
Now this is a fascinating claim. I do think that Holmes is at the top end of these categories (Smarts and Generalship) but I think that Ali outstrips him cleanly. The obvious example would be the early adjustment v Williams and the Foreman fight. What examlples would you provide for Holmes' smarts?
No 5, I think Holmes gives any Champion a close fight. he had a right uppercut the equal of Johnsons,a fast jab ,hurtful right ,great powers of recuperation ,and very big balls. Best performance =Cooney Worst performance =Spinks 1 [Im talking while Champ]. Should have given Witherspoon and Williams rematches,and fought Page and Thomas.If he had won he would be top 3 for me.