Let's talk about Usyk vs Joshua ridiculous scorecards

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lordlosh, Sep 28, 2021.


  1. StiffJeb

    StiffJeb Member Full Member

    281
    397
    Sep 18, 2021
    But you're still arguing?

    Obviously Joshua landed, if he didn't land anything to what Usyk did it should have been 10-8.

    But regardless. I'm not saying there's a 0% chance that the judge was clean or unbiased, but I would say that it's more likely he had an absence seizure during the round than for him to analytically score it for him.

    Can you accept that the significantly more realistic assumption is that he was paid off/pressured than that he was honest?
     
  2. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,761
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    Yeah bro, every single event in UK, there is some HUGE, and i mean f**** huge highway robberies.
    We should talk about this, way more often, because people are so fast to forget.
    Let's not act like everything was alright, because it's absolutely note.
    They were absolutely ready to cut Usyk head off.
    Let's be real the scorecards would have looked a lot different on all judges scorecard, had Joshua actually shows up in the 12.

    And no we should not be okay, that 2 of the judges got the right result, but still were biased towards Joshua.
    I'm also not okay with 116-112.

    So what know, Joshua will come better in the rematch, which will be obvious to expect, at the end of the day he loses, and got to be a complete i***** to not improve, and actually do better in the rematch. The fight will most probably be closer, but that alone automatically mean Joshua will get the node in the scorecards.
     
    StiffJeb likes this.
  3. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,761
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    I see you edit your post, which is good, but i give the scorecards for a reason.
    There is no f***** chance in whatever f***** criteria anyone could think about that AJ won the very first round. There is no f***** way in hell.
    This alone Screams Corruption as it highest.
    It's one thing to make a case for the 4th round for AJ(you pretty much can't make a case for any other round lol, and while you can make a case for the 5 or 8 for Usyk tho), it's completely another to give the first round to AJ, that even the so biased usually English commentators give that round for Usyk clearly, and all of them.
    The fight was so easy to score, that even the English commentators and the guy that scored the fight, had at minimum Usyk by 4 rounds. The one that scored the fight has it exactly like me 117-111, and he give him exact the same round 4,5 and the 8, as this is pretty much the round you can give to AJ.

    Brighton bomber, your post make no f***** sense at all bro.
     
  4. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,988
    19,869
    Nov 27, 2010
    At most generous Joshua won 3 rds. I had it 8-3-1 the 10th being a tie.

    Those scorecards were crapola.