Lewis: "Everything the Klitschkos do is fuss"

jacl i got to the part where you said why didnt wlad fight mormeck on vitalis undercard and stopped reading..you seriously are a ****ing fool...why didnt pac fight clottey on someones undercard because it was a ****ing mis match..you see what i did there...mismatches happen in boxing esp when your a dominating **** who has already cleaned everybody out and is waiting on the new crop to take a stand..by **** you are one stupid ****..you can try and put your point across anyway you want its still boils down to the same bull****..and by the way how can i ignore your points then argue against them??you really fit the bill here (never argue with an idiot because theyl bring you down to their level and beat you with experiance)....people go to see klitschko fights..they dont care about the undercard so why the **** should you??its as if you just go around and look for something to moan about...your more anoying thasn a boil on the tip of the cack

 

Yes, I do. I see the point going a million miles above your head.

Pacquiao vs. Clottey was a decent fight at the time, but it also had a good undercard. Did it need one? No. Did it have one? Yes. Soto/Diaz, Gomez/Castillo, Duddy/Medina were all good fights.

If Wlad wants to fight Mormeck, that's fine. However, why not give the fans a decent undercard?

Amazingly, you seem to think I'm saying that all the elite fighters should fight on one single card. I'm not saying that at all. What I am saying, is that if the main event is a mismatch, give the fans something else they want to see.

 

Dude, I understand your point... They Are Seperate People...


But that swings both ways. They have re-match clauses stating that if you beat one brother, you have to fight the other in a re-match.

People can't expect to be treated as separate entities when it suits them, and treated as the same entity when that suits them to.


People are arguing with double standards if you ask me - Using phrases such as THEY are the most dominant Champions etc. That is an example of double standards. Imagine if Oleg Maskaev, Shannon Briggs, Wladimir Klitschko and Ruslan Chagaev got together and said: WE are the dominant Heavyweight Champions. WE cleaned out the division.

It's nonsense.

Look at the thread talking about the Klitschko Brothers' resumes. It combines TWO fighters records into one list. Nobody does this with Lewis and Tyson, or Ali and Foreman.

As far as I'm concerned, the two brothers are separate fighters. Of course it would be unethical to make them fight - But it is ridiculous for either of them to call themselves dominant, or to argue they cleaned out the division, when there is still one other fighter out there, that neither will face.

I respect them - A lot. But I find it very annoying when people use double standards in defending them, and promoting their legacies.

 

But going back to the original point - There's clearly an agenda behind Lewis' comments... Question is, what?

 

jack thats exactly what your saying..your saying two champions should fight on the same card and earn less money all to please you....at the end of the day people know they are going to see a klit show and still pay to do so so i dont get your point..infact your even going on about it shows your one hatefull *******...

 

REMATCH CLAUSE TO FIGHT THE OTHER CHAMPION ISNT REALLY THAT UNFAIR IS IT??I MEAN I WOULD LOOK PAST IT IF ONE OF THEM WASNT A CHAMPION BUT THEY ARE OFFERING A UNIFICATION BOUT TO ANYONE WHO BEATS THEM FOR A CHANCE TO BE THE UNDISPUTED HW CHAMP SO SORRY I DONT AGREE WITH YOU THERE...THEY ARE TWO CHAMPIONS AND ANY SUGGESTION OF FIGHTING ON THE SAME CARD IS ******ED...AND IM NOT SAYING YOUR ******ED..IM SAYING JACK IS...:good

 

What does that even mean? "Your opinion says a lot more about you"!?!?errrr yeah.:nut

Like i said your hurt because Lennox was asked his opinion and gave one that wasn't pro Klitschko. Even if it wasn't Lewis who said it, you'd still be in this thread spouting the same insults at people who agree with this opinion.

It's not hard to figure out is it? Lewis is a superior HW, is held in higher esteem than your fantasy men, he's opinion is worth hearing and he is in my avatar.
You can't handle it so respond with predictable posts.

BTW over use of the word boy shows insecurity son.

 

he can shut the **** up. he chose to end his career on a controversial win against a dangerous opponent and not give a rematch. that fight with vitali will always cast a long shadow over his ass. if he had come back and beat vitali convincingly he wouldnt need to do this. but he had serious doubts that he could, obviously, or he would have.

shut the **** up LL. you chose not to get in the ring.

and you get to live with that for
the
rest
of
your
life

 

Hid behind his mum's skirt after turning down approx 30 million to rematch Vitali as promised.

 

To me, your post seems to be merely a game of semantics.

Two brothers ruling a division is a unique situation. Yet you and others persist in viewing it with the glasses from previous eras: "What if Ali and Frazier united and took over." Well, they were not brothers, so that would be a different case.

Wlad and Vitali are effectivly one unit and shares the throne. While you can discredit them as single fighters, the bottom line is that they dominate. If a relevant challanger rises in the ranks, it hardly matters which brother who beats him. As long as he loses to a Klitschko it's all good.

Byrd and Sanders were able to do a number on one of them each, but was smashed to pieces by the other. **** in terms of resume to have your bro avenging your defeat? Fine, but never the less both Byrd and Sanders were written out of the plot, while the noble Klitschkos prevail.