Lewis would have went through Wlad's resume undefeated and completely dominant

He's never been down for the count like Lennox has, he also wasn't knocked out by Sanders, that was a ref stoppage. Lewis was down for the count against Rahman...

Lennox has a better uppercut that's about it.... Wlad has the better jab, better straight right, footwork, and of course more KO power(as confirmed by their mutual trainer Emmanuel Steward) :good

 

He's been down 11 times. Let's get the stats correct.

 

And, even though Wlad didn't fight McCall, Ollie gave Lennox the the one punch KO as well.

But Lennox is one of the greatest heavyweights. I think Vitali would beat him about 6 times out of 10 and Wlad would beat him about 4 times out of 10.

 

the 2nd KO was a fraudulent one????? huh?:huh
akanwande also technically scored a KD over Lewis, although the ref didnt count it.

what we know is this. most of the time when Wlad gets knocked down he gets up, Lennox doesn't. 2 kd and 2 KO losses.

 

It's laughable to think a heavyweight--any heavyweight--is ever going to go 66-0 fighting world-rated competition for 15 years.

Marciano, the one heavyweight who managed to retire as undefeated champ? His entire career was shorter than the reigns of numerous heavyweight champions. Not their entire careers; just their title reigns.

 

Lewis would have 3-5 losses had he had 66 fights. He was just way too arrogant and inconsistent for a 66-0 record. It's not a knock on his boxing ability (which is ATG level), it's a knock on his character. He was lazy at times, downright arrogant and complacent.

 

Brian Nielson retired 64-3-0

Its all about who you beat in this sport.

 

You're proving my point.

Brian Nielsen didn't face world caliber competition for 15 years, and couldn't go unbeaten with the shoddy competition he did face.

It's impossible. Ali couldn't do it. Louis couldn't do it. Nobody could.

Name any heavyweight you want. You will never find one that can go 66-0 fighting world caliber competition for 15 years.

And there's well over 100 years of results backing that up.

 

Wlad didn't face world caliber competition for 15 years. Most of his record his padded and he still took bad loses that he didn't want to avenge.

 

He knocked out Schulz in 99 and beat Byrd in a one-sided decision in 2000. Those are world-caliber wins.

Wlad- a dominant champion himself- couldn't do what I described.

Name me one other heavyweight in history who's been unbeaten for 15 years fighting world-rated competition, been a champion, and never lost.

There is none. Zip. Zero. Nobody.

If there was, that heavyweight would be the GOAT, no questions asked.

 

Padding a record for 15 years is what you're saying? :rofl:rofl:rofl You're delusional.

 

The majority of the guys he fought were potato peelers.

You're delusional or are in plain denial if you're telling me the following were not record padders

Pianeta
Leapai
Wach
Mormeck
Thompson II
Retired Brewster
Castilo
Nicholson
Moli

His first 30 fights are worse than Wilders. And he still took a loss. Oh dear!

 

lepai and Thompson 2 were both mandatory defenses you have an agenda and are too stupid to realize that beating a mandatory challenger is not padding your record.. Also look at all the bums on Ali's record lewis's Louis, Marciano every atg had hard and easy fights on their record. :blood