LHW picture between 1916-1926

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Apr 9, 2013.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    the main players were Dillon, Levinsky, Greb, Tunney, Gibbons and Norfolk.

    this was right slap bang in the NWS era and after Levinsky took the title from Dillon he really took advantage of this and basically refused to actually fight the top names, and when he did he'd just fight to survive knowing as long as he saw the final bell, he'd still be champ.

    For these years he was consistently being beaten by Greb and Gibbons in these nws fights which could indicate their superiority although it was never proved in a real fight.

    Greb and Gibbons did have a proper fight in Mar 22 which decisively showed who the best LHW in the world was, imo, but ios it fair to let Levinsky keep his number 1 spot until the Carpentier fight?

    Tough making sense of it all and would like opinions from anyone who's looked into this era.

    I'm not a huge believer in holding an NWS loss against a fighter since their only expectation as champ is to survive the 10 rounds or so. when it's 12 rounds I guess that could be different I'm not sure.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,526
    47,717
    Feb 11, 2005
    Its a choppy era, and one in which i dont think the light heavy title yet meant much. All these guys had a run, and most a very successful run, at the heavyweight title. I have to think a bit more on this, but it definitely deserves to be bumped for the likes of Janitor to respond.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    It's tough to make sense of really and I've been looking into it for dozens of months now. I can accept levinsky being the number 1 when he outpoints Dillon but I'm not convinced he deserved to stay at number 1 up until the carpentier ko.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    Is there anyone who's looked into this era, senya maybe? Janitor?

    I'm sure that for the most part Greb and gibbons would have been higher regarded than levinsky but from when? It's hard nailing down the moment when they overtook levinsky?

    I remember reading a top class debate between klompton and senya about the gibbons brothers. Shame they aren't active on here these days.
     
  5. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    101
    Jul 20, 2010
    Wow! Did I miss that debate?? I can't recall. Would love to read that one!
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    It weren't on this site. I was trawling the web for info on the brothers when I came across it. Might have been boxrec forum it was on.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
  8. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,973
    2,419
    Jul 11, 2005
    I'm not into lhw's, sorry.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009

    No worries. Don't seem many people are, particularly this ere anyways. It wasn't really a division it was more a way for guys to pick up a belt on their way to challenging for the HW title.
     
  10. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,638
    1,914
    Dec 2, 2006
    Levinsky did take over from Dillon around 1916, was near eneough the best until '18 and after that the mantell had really passed on to -take your pick-Greb, Gibbons, Tunney, Norfolk. Carpentier was probably passed his best by the time he "won" it and Siki-while underatted-and Mctigue-Very overrated-were only top 10 men at best. From Berlenbach on it resumed more normal and correct linage. That's my take anyway, I suppose the bottom line is it never mattered much to public or boxers until about 1926/27 except maybe for O'Brien or Fitz.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    I agree. It's specifically the "take your pick" bit I'm struggling with. Trying to nail down the time when levinsky stopped being number 1 and someone else did.

    Gibbons was probably the most consistent, Greb had the best win list and Norfolk was the man noone wanted to fight. Tough to pick a man above the rest.

    My gut says gibbons from the Christie fight until the Greb loss. From then the number 1 is probably the American champ until tunney moved up and was it berlenbach beat mctigue? That's my gut instinct anyways.

    Am I off the mark there?
     
  12. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,638
    1,914
    Dec 2, 2006
    No you are probably as near as it can be got but in reality with so many ND and so many top guys fighting so often and fighting each other they all dropped the odd one here and there. Loughran and Stribling came along around 1924/5 as well while before that circa 1916/7 Billy Miske was operating around 175 as well and better than anybody. Also from 1912-16 Jeff Clarke was more than a match for any light-heavy in the world. So how about Fitz, O'Brien, Burns, Langford, Clarke, Dillon, Levinsky, Miske, Gibbons, Greb, Norfolk, Greb, Tunney, Stribling, Loughran?-not a bad bunch?
     
  13. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    403
    Jan 22, 2010
    After Gene Tunney fought as a heavyweight ,I believe the top LH in the mid twenties was Jack Delaney who had everything needed to be a great lightheavyweight. Delaney could, box beautifully and was a great right hand puncher..But like Bob Foster tried to fight the HWs with little success...Delaney holds one of the great distinctions in boxing lore...
     
  14. Lord Tywin

    Lord Tywin Guest

    In 1917 Greb beat both Levinsky (having Levinsky out on his feet in the final round after a knockdown) and Dillon. He beat Miske in 1918 and 1919. He split two fights in 1920 with Gibbons. Fought on even terms with Kid Norfolk in 1921. Dominated Gibbons and Tunney in 1922.

    During that same period Gibbons had only two marquee wins at 175: Greb (which was avenged) and Levinsky.

    During that same period Miske lost to Greb, Levinsky and Kid Norfolk (twice to each fighter) and those were the biggest fights he had at the weight. I dont see any way anyone can say Miske could ever have been called the best in the division.

    During that period Norfolk lost to Clay Turner twice and Gus Christie depending on which source you use. He beat Miske and fought on even terms with Greb though and supposedly was ducked by Gibbons. In fact its pretty safe to say he was being avoided by a lot of fighters which makes it difficult to place him.

    Carpentier only had two real fights at light heavy during this period, his knockout of Levinsky and his loss to Siki.

    My point is that Greb was at least as good, if not better than anyone in the division until Gene Tunney finally moved ahead of him in the mid 1920s. There were fighters like Gibbons and Norfolk who could fight on even terms with him over a series or on a given night but even they couldnt be said to be "better" or able to defeat him consistently enough to be termed his master.

    After Tunney moves up the picture gets muddled again. Delaney was inconsistent. He also had a lot of injuries, and was supposedly being moved by the mob. Berlenbach was being protected and carefully matched.

    Loughran had a nice unbeaten streak during this time but it coincides with a drop in his level of competition as Greb dies, Tunney, and Delaney move up in weight, and Berlenbach fades out of existence. He beat Young Stribling who was also in the midst of nice unbeaten streak but Stribling's level of competition at this point was almost abysmal.

    Loughran was probably the best for a while but I think the division really slipped after the Greb/Tunney era. Neither ever held the title but while they were in the division Id be willing to bet they would have been a favorite over Berlenbach. Delaney may have been seen as being able to give either a good fight but I dont think he beats either one.