That i will agree with stadium fights are ridiculous, especially 90,000... I was at brammall lane last year, 26,000 and the view was really poor. When I have been to MEN seated about 10 rows back on lower tier the view was fantastic. I would.never go to another stadium fight again, but that's boxing hype for you. A stadium bought does make the fight better for TV though!
Solely down to the ref. Nothing else. Nothing to do with his ability, speed or power. Every one of his 20 knockouts has been down to the ref.
If you take away the takam fight then who else? I'm not all AJ but I just don't get why one of our British fighters can get so much grief when he is unified heavyweight champ...
Most are trash anyways but some of the knockouts have been when the opponents was still on his feet and be honest could have continued not to say he wouldn't have stopped them but the ref was dying to step in and the takam stoppage was just a disgrace
alot of people dont like the way he became a champion it seemed like a well thought out plan Fury has to vacate then all of a sudden a title becomes available for aj against probably the worst champion ever
Brezealle? Whyte? Klitschko? Martin didn't want it could all those have carried on? The takam fight was a poor stoppage, so what we are now going to do is link that to every other fight he has had, come on man
That's because it was, and how can you blame them? Martin was a weak champ and he took the belt from him, but I'd say he made up for that by beating a wladimir Klitschko's who looked in fantastic shape where he unified the division.
And the vacant wba in a unification for a vacant title that was just another way to get aj another title
Against wladimir Klitschko's, hardly a given free title, the way wlad fought I don't think fury would have beat him. AJ won't get the full credit until he beats fury, hence why fury is still the ring magazine belt holder, we will wait and see that fight but in the meantime either enjoy it or don't watch it, easy.
Because matchroom said it was a better version that fury fought lol typical fan boy I will always pick against him because his only stepped up twice and the flaws and to many flaws got exposed
No mate, because I watched and saw, if you were a boxing fan you would have seen that wlad was significantly better against AJ. His timing, his movement his footwork. He was flat and complacent against fury who produced a great performance to beat him.
Fury made him look terrible aj been flawed made klitshcko look better he hadn't fought was rusty as hell and when he had aj all over he could not pull the trigger and by the way many ref's could have stopped that and there wouldn't have been many compliments matchroom down played Furys performance because a shell of klitchsko almost knocked there fighter out