Hagler's boxing skill is getting severely underrated here. As usual, I guess. Comments-wise. The poll looks good.
I see the "Hagler was a brawler" myth lives on. Please actually take the time to watch Hagler's fights throughout the course of his title reign (and even before that) to see his style.
Yeah, I just to under-rate him big-time a couple of years ago, but technically he is a wonderful fighter. It's that level of adaptability, being able to box and brawl, that I see preventing Toney from finding any rhythm and I think he loses a pretty decisive 8-4/9-3 decision. If it's over 15, Hagler takes the championship rounds and it becomes more one-sided.
I disagree. I think Hagler had excellent boxing ability, but not on the same level as James Toney. I think James Toney is being severely underrated here. To be honest, a motivated James Toney is a head to head nightmare for anyone in history from maybe 160 (which he was green at) to Cruiserweight.
Hagler. As much as I like Toney, IMO @ 160lbs he always appeared to have wt. issues. against Hagler he would need to come in 110%. If the fight happened at 168lbs I'd prob favor James.. Anyway, Hagler by UD.