Lik what im hearing from burns

You are as deluded as Ricky and Billy are.

 

It's, "I could have" - not, "I could of".

Basic grammar my friend. Sort it out.

 

Burns won't beat Crawford, I doubt he could be Beltran in a rematch and Broner, despite his recent hammering by Maidana, would still easily beat Burns if they fought at 140

 

Burns is on top of his game when he's fighting shams.

 

:rofl You cant question anybody's opinion you negative twat. You think Naz has the best jab and movement from any british boxer you've ever seen That is the type of boxing knowledge you get off an armchair fan :-(

**** off Solaris you gimp :finger5

 

Look at the key words, "you've ever seen".

I don't pretend to know more than I do just to fit in. It's a shame you're yet another forum sheep desperate for approval. :good

Don't remember saying he had the best jab either? Happy to be corrected but believe you are talking yet more shite.

What is it with your Scotch and being thick?

 

No it's the fact were proud scots, boxing has a bias towards England lets be perfectly honest, now apart from Froch Ricky is the most successful fighter in the UK and that leaves a sour taste in the mouth to many.
Last night preview of the year I turned off after 30 mins, Scotlands two weight world champ got a 5sec mention totally disgraceful, the only saving grace is there's no Englishman who's good enough to share a ring with him let alone beat him.

 

x2

 

What leaves a sour taste in the mouth is you telling people Burns v Beltran was a fair result.

We are months on from that fight and you still lack the dignity and class to be honest about how much of a robbery that was.

Pathetic.

 

Honestly, I find you utterly embarrassing. If I behaved the way you do when representing my company I would be out on my ear within hours.

I'm not sure why Ricky puts up with you, it's not as if (judging by his last few fights) you are a world class trainer so it's slightly strange.

 

But I'm better than you