Like Hopkins said Joe knows the Judges

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Canibus81, Nov 13, 2008.


  1. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    It was a disputed decision Calzaghe still makes excuses for, and "experts" still say Hopkins won. It doesn't matter if a bunch of pricks want to argue about it on the internet.
     
  2. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    So SHUT THE **** UP WITH YOUR WHINING THEN YOU DOPEY **** :lol:

    :| :| :| :| :|

    "Experts" said Jones was going to beat Calzaghe. Calzaghe beats Jones, all of a sudden these "experts" are backtracking and claiming RJJ was past it/shot/too old, etc.

    Same with the Hopkins fight, but Hopkins proved them wrong when he beat Pavlik.

    You ***s should go a lick each other's red raw, sore and sorry arses instead of constantly bleating on here about what the "experts" claim.

    I don't see any of you backing up Johnson's claim that he beat Dawson (see the open letter from Glencoffe thread), I wonder why? :think
     
  3. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,676
    13,468
    Jan 6, 2007

    Calzaghe doesn't NEED to make excuses.

    He won, decisively.

    Despite the holding and the grabbing and the fake low blows to buy a rest.


    And it wasn't close.



    Get over it.
     
  4. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,676
    13,468
    Jan 6, 2007

    The judges scored it 9-3, 8-4 and 6-6.

    9-3 was the closest to being correct.
     
  5. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    26
    Sep 16, 2008
    I was one of the ones who thought Johnson beat Dawson as well. And just cause a lot of the experts thought Jones would win, doesn't mean they didn't realize how past his prime Jones was.(they gave Jones a big punchers chance and in the first it almost looked that way) I picked Calzaghe to beat Jones, cause I knew Jones was washed up, and even was wondering why everybody was picking Jones. But I was one of the ones who not only thought Hopkins won the fight against Calzaghe, but believes he'll beat him more convincingly next time if they do it again. I'm usually right 85% of the time on boxing matches and I'll be right on this one if it happens again.
     
  6. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Nah, dumb ****, it's always been the basis for everything that has ever been said on the subject. That's the point. It's bitches like you that have not stopped crying and whining. STFU. It's DISPUTED, get the context, simpleton.. This is about Calzaghe wanting to run away with the "win." Calzaghe wants to duck the direct challenge of a second fight. It's no wonder - he was "exposed" in a "master class." Stick to trolling and throwing weak insults, ****. You have the reasoning skills of a ******, and the boxing knowledge of a vegetable.
     
  7. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    See, now that's just some empty nonsense.. No basis in reality. Too many excuses.
     
  8. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Even the Calzaghe fanboys know it.. That's why they're toeing the line, clinging desperately to a so called "win" in what amounts to one of the most pathetic showcases by an alleged world class fighter ever set on canvas. They don't want the rematch - because they know what would happen.
     
  9. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    26
    Sep 16, 2008
    Hey san, do you think Hopkins would knock out Calzaghe in the rematch or win a unanamous decision?
     
  10. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Either way. He would get banged up regardless.
     
  11. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,676
    13,468
    Jan 6, 2007

    Yes, it was very cowardly of Calzaghe to insist that the fight be held in Wales with a Welsh ref and three Welsh judges.

    And cowardly of Joe to clutch and grab most of the fight because he couldn't deal with Bernard's pressure.

    And most cowardly was Joe's faking of a low blows to buy time and get a rest because he couldn't go 12 round with Bernard any other way.

    What a coward !
     
  12. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    26
    Sep 16, 2008
    Either way, even if it doesn't happen, Hopkins will get more credit when their careers are all over with for what they've accomplished and be remembered more. And for all we know Hopkins might beat Dawson next. Calzaghe is gonna be another Marciano, good, but not great.
     
  13. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    What's with all :| and excuses? **** all that. What did Calzaghe do?? At least Hopkins landed punches. Calzaghe threw multiple low blows and dozens and dozens of rabbit punches. THAT'S CHEATING. The sideshow antics of Hopkins were laughable, but far from mention worthy. "Hopkins did this, Hopkins did that.." Waaaaah, waaaaah...
     
  14. session9

    session9 Member Full Member

    362
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    Some medical "experts" will still attest that there is no link between cigarettes and cancer. And there were "experts" advising people to invest their nest-eggs in Icelandic banks the same week they went bust. Just saying.
     
  15. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    26
    Sep 16, 2008
    The only problem is the coward has 101 excuses why he won't prove that the rematch would be easier. I mean the coward even went on record and said he didn't train hard for the first fight, remember, the coward decided to fight a washed up roy jones, instead of a prime Pavlik, and he's wondering why he still gets no credit. Well, that's what cowards do.