Is that the point? It doesn't matter what we find to be true individually. When you have a platform as big as ESPN, the Yahoo homepage, and the Associated Press, and you're saying this stuff it's INFLUENTAL. You couldn't buy that type of coverage. Not for millions of dollars.
It's disputed only by idiots like you. Calzaghe won a SPLIT decision, not a DISPUTED decision. Many experts are often wrong, this is a point in case, yet you cling to what their opinions were to bolster your biased agenda. Stop trying to hang your hat on bull**** claims, you're trying to build a house of rock on sand buddy :deal
That's true enough. Maybe the "experts" should be the ones getting criticised in this kind of situation instead of either of the fighters.
First off, Hopkins has about 1.5 fanboys and they don't own a computer. Secondly, Calzaghe is obviously inferior to Hopkins as talent, figure, and statesman, and is blatanly ducking the challenge of a rematch. This will never move on for Calzaghe. That's the point here. If it was going to it would have, so you better ****ing enjoy, dude.
Not disputed?? I suppose this isn't Earth... :rofl ****ing moron. Dumbest **** ever. Quit trying to buddy up with me, ****. You're not saying ****. Quit wasting my time. Make a point, FFS..
As long as whiny bitches like you exist, an issue will always be made of it go and change your tampon *****, you're hemmorrhaging all over the shop you whiny *****
What exactly are you saying here **** feechurs? I say the result is only disputed by idiots like you and you come back with Earth and buddy ****? Go **** yourself you dopey **** - you're a whining ***** who should go to Philly and suck Hopkins **** so you can get what you're so obviously needing
Don't bother arguing with them mate. They're not worth the effort. If the roles were reversed they'd still be arguing that Calzaghe won.