Like Hopkins said Joe knows the Judges

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Canibus81, Nov 13, 2008.


  1. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Is that the point? It doesn't matter what we find to be true individually. When you have a platform as big as ESPN, the Yahoo homepage, and the Associated Press, and you're saying this stuff it's INFLUENTAL. You couldn't buy that type of coverage. Not for millions of dollars.
     
  2. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    :lol:
     
  3. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,351
    11,385
    Jan 6, 2007

    You didn't answer a single point of the post you responded to.
     
  4. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    It's disputed only by idiots like you.

    Calzaghe won a SPLIT decision, not a DISPUTED decision.

    Many experts are often wrong, this is a point in case, yet you cling to what their opinions were to bolster your biased agenda.

    Stop trying to hang your hat on bull**** claims, you're trying to build a house of rock on sand buddy :deal
     
  5. session9

    session9 Member Full Member

    362
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    That's true enough. Maybe the "experts" should be the ones getting criticised in this kind of situation instead of either of the fighters.
     
  6. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    First off, Hopkins has about 1.5 fanboys and they don't own a computer. Secondly, Calzaghe is obviously inferior to Hopkins as talent, figure, and statesman, and is blatanly ducking the challenge of a rematch. This will never move on for Calzaghe. That's the point here. If it was going to it would have, so you better ****ing enjoy, dude.
     
  7. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
     
  8. session9

    session9 Member Full Member

    362
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    The dispute should have been between Adelaide Byrd and her optician.
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Not disputed?? I suppose this isn't Earth... :rofl ****ing moron. Dumbest **** ever. Quit trying to buddy up with me, ****. You're not saying ****. Quit wasting my time. Make a point, FFS..
     
  10. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    As long as whiny bitches like you exist, an issue will always be made of it

    go and change your tampon *****, you're hemmorrhaging all over the shop you whiny ***** :lol:
     
  11. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    What exactly are you saying here **** feechurs?

    I say the result is only disputed by idiots like you and you come back with Earth and buddy ****? :lol:

    Go **** yourself you dopey **** - you're a whining ***** who should go to Philly and suck Hopkins **** so you can get what you're so obviously needing
     
  12. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    It's not up to us.
     
  13. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    There's the worthless troll.. What do you want? A ****ing autograph?
     
  14. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    Don't bother arguing with them mate. They're not worth the effort. If the roles were reversed they'd still be arguing that Calzaghe won.
     
  15. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    25
    Sep 16, 2008