Like Tyson, Kirkland can't Ko everybody!!!

Ok, guys. I think Hussleman gets the point now that Kirkland is nowhere near the level of Tyson.

He's just trying to say; don't be too harsh on Kirkland, because be was up against an opponent that was very tricky/awkward. It's hard to look good, and even beat, a guy like that.

But with that said, it does prove for sure now that Kirkland is heavily susceptible to good, technical boxers who are crafty with their defence and attack. He can quite easily be tamed.

 

Not at all technically tyson was light years ahead of Kirkland and frankly in every other department. And their styles are not same.

 

Go to my thread that I made "Cotto's style similiar to Henry Bruseles" and you might understand why sometimes he doesn't get the point in some of the illogical things he usually says.

 

Yeah, I hear you, dawg. Hussleman does have some...(what's the best word)...'contentious' views (to put it nicely). But in this thread, his comparison aside, I do kinda' get what he's tryna' say.

 

Yea but you can't make a rational arguement when your biased and he's very biased, i'm suprised people can't see that in all his posts.

 

Kirkland is a slugger with overated power who doesn't posess one punch ko power, who has a terrible chin, who gets bullied by weaklings like Molina, KO'd by weaklings like Ishida and would get outboxed by any decent boxer. As someone else mentioned....he's a poor mans Juan Urango. Dude sucks!

 

no

 

Kirkland has no suppleness, speed, or agility to compliment his physical strength.