lineal title at HW right now

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stinky gloves, Oct 16, 2007.


  1. thesandman

    thesandman Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    5
    Jul 29, 2004
    Linear doesn't matter who is ranked #1 or #2 etc. Or who has belts.

    That's how Briggs got it - by beating Foreman - who beat Moorer, etc.

    Then Lewis (by beating Briggs) - Rahman - Lewis.

    Now nobody.

    Unification is required for a new linear champ. Ring belt is very different.


    IF the line is broken, then unifying the ABC belts is required for a new line to start. Some say just WBA & WBC. Some say any 2 of the main 3 - some say all 3.

    I personally think it should be all 3, but that's getting harder and harder these days.
     
  2. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Yes, they were both rated #1 and #2. What I am saying is that this proves that unifying the WBA and WBC is NOT needed to create a lineal champion.

    Truth be told, no one seems to know a clear way.
     
  3. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,045
    Jan 29, 2005
    No, Peter does not have the WBC title. It still belongs to Maskaev for KOing Rahman.

    Let us not forget that. Peter has NO title till (if) he beats Maskaev.

    Maskaev is the WBC champion til its taken away from him in the ring.
     
  4. Butch Coolidge

    Butch Coolidge Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,305
    2,626
    Jul 20, 2004
    Wladimir Klitschko<Lamon Brewste< Sergei Lyakhovich<Shannon Briggs<Sultan Ibragimov>Evander Holyfield.