Liston #1 heavyweight head to head?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jul 4, 2009.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,063
    Mar 21, 2007
    http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxing-article/6887/liston-chronicles-part-iii-conquering-sonny/


    "Who would be the king of the hill?

    At first glance, Liston is an unlikely contender in such a competition. His championship reign lasted through one defense. Sure, he had the misfortune of crossing paths with the greatest sports phenomenon of the twentieth century but he also was foolish enough to take him lightly. Then he squandered (or was forced to squander) his chance for redemption in the rematch. This isn’t the stuff of a great championship reign, and I submit that any boxing writer who lists Sonny’s reign anywhere near the top should be sent packing to Wimbledon –where he can watch those other guys in shorts.

    Many boxing critics, however, suffer from Ali-induced myopia. They see Liston sagging on his stool in Miami or they see him splayed on the canvas in Neil Leifer’s iconic photograph and go no farther. They forget that Liston began his disappointing title reign late, that his career was stunted by incarceration through 1957 and Cus D’Amato’s unwillingness to see Floyd Patterson face a real contender. This much is certain: the fighter who stepped into the ring against Cassius Clay was not the fighter who stepped into the ring against Cleveland Williams five years earlier. That Liston, the 1959 version, commands a closer look. He’s the sleeper in our “king of the hill” competition:

    Physicality

    Size isn’t everything. Dempsey treated Jess Willard like a Kansas tornado would a cull tree. Louis easily chopped down giants like Primo Carnera, Abe Simon, and Buddy Baer. Size isn’t everything -but that’s not to say it doesn’t matter. A new breed of coordinated giants has taken over the heavyweight division. Dempsey and Louis, at 187½ and 201 respectively, may not have had enough physical strength to fend off the less lumbering giants of today, though they would have had the skill… Liston had both.

    With a wingspan as long as Lennox Lewis’s at 84 inches, a fist that was by some reports fifteen inches around, and therefore bigger than Willard’s, Carnera’s, both Klitschko brothers’, and Nicolay Valuev’s, Liston’s threw punches like medieval catapults threw boulders.

    Walking around at about 230 lbs and trained down to 212½ in his prime, he was by all reports exceptionally strong. George Foreman, who used to spar with Liston in the late 1960s, admitted that the only man who was ever able to move him backwards against his will was Sonny Liston. Liston fought several large men. He did not have to concede space.

    Fifty years ago, big men trained down from their ‘walking around’ weight. Today, fewer heavyweights are so disciplined. They seemed to have signed tacit agreements to waltz and posture rather than wage wars and punch. They don’t have to fight fifteen rounds anymore and they barely bother breaking a sweat in twelve. Liston did –and as a group, the men he fought came into the ring in good condition -unlike “Fast-Chomping” Eddie Chambers and Sam “Pizza” last March. Liston’s size and proportions make him a juggernaut. Standing just under 6’1, he had the proportions of a larger man. His musculature was streamlined and functional and the veins popping out of his neck looked like cables. His presence in the ring exuded a bullish power, and his center of gravity, lower than longer men like Lennox Lewis, translated into more concentrated physical strength. It is unlikely that any modern heavyweight would physically dominate Liston. Especially the fat ones.

    “When he hits,” an acquaintance told Jack McKinney in 1962, “he hits every cop who ever beat him. He hits every white man who ever looked at him. I think he’s on the edge of violence.” Like Lennox and the Klitschkos, Liston could punch like hell with either hand. Unlike Lennox or the Klitschkos, Liston’s chin was rock solid.

    His exceptional physical strength and punching power would serve him well against smaller champions like Dempsey, Marciano, and Frazier. Tyson admitted in the late eighties that he saw trouble with the Liston jab, but he’d have had more trouble coping with Liston’s strength inside. Evander Holyfield’s strategy against Tyson was grounded in the theory that Tyson’s offense required forward motion. So Holyfield muscled him and mounted his offense while Tyson was out of position. If Holyfield’s relatively spindly legs could walk Tyson backwards, Liston would have no problem doing the same.

    Sonny would be hard to withstand for any of his heavyweight peers who couldn’t match his strength. Those who could are very few. And even if a Foreman or a Klitschko could deal with his Hulk-strength, they’d still have to find a way to overcome his Doc Bruce Banner boxing brain.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,063
    Mar 21, 2007
    Technical Skill/Experience

    Ali himself conceded that Liston’s brutality was scientific. He was unusual in this regard. Joe Louis was arguably the supreme technician among the heavyweight champions, but Liston was at least as well-rounded as Larry Holmes, Tyson, Holyfield, or Riddick Bowe. He was a murderous body puncher, knew his way around inside, was devastating mid-range, and could control most fighters from the outside. His jab was a telephone pole used not to dazzle, but to shock a man or knock him off balance so that Sonny could drive in with power shots.

    Liston could punch in combination to the body and head. He could get a bit narcoleptic behind his jab and he tended to follow movers like Clay and Eddie Machen instead of cutting the ring off, but when he bent those knees and cornered his man, his explosiveness could make a grown man cry. And the attack was intelligent. What he lacked in speed he compensated for with leverage, good balance, and shots that were short, diverse, and well-placed. This didn’t change even as he aged. The punches he landed downstairs on Leotis Martin sounded like bowling balls dropping on wet salami.

    Even at the end, Sonny threw combinations that are noticeably absent among the “punch-and-wait” style of modern giants. Left hooks were followed with right crosses, right crosses and uppercuts were followed by left hooks. Straight rights to the body were followed by left hooks to the head. He could adjust for distance and find angles. He did not disdain defense. His head moved after punching, he blocked, parried, weaved under shots and got into position to return fire. At times Sonny’s skillful slips and counters could make James Toney raise an eyebrow.

    There are several heavyweight champions who have faced better competition than Liston. Ali, Lewis, Holyfield, and Tyson are among them. Liston did gain valuable experience facing several different styles in his seventeen-year career –boxer-punchers, counter-punchers, swarmers, sluggers, southpaws, and super heavyweights.

    Intangibles

    “When I broke his jaw,” Marty Marshall recalled, “he didn’t even blink.” That was 1954, ten years before Liston met Clay. Cleveland Williams broke his nose in the first round of their first war in 1959. Blood poured like lava but the expression on Liston’s face looked like he was playing poker. In round three he turned the tables. In the rematch, Williams stunned him in round two only to see Liston shut him down seconds later. Liston virtually cleaned out the top ten contenders on his way to Floyd Patterson and avoided no one, even taking the short-end money just to fight them.

    How many fighters today would be willing to accept high risk/low reward bouts? Prime Liston built his ring reputation on exactly that.

    …..

    In the end, it can be argued that Liston was almost a complete heavyweight. Most of the big boys have excelled with fewer assets than Liston had. Like any fighter, he also had a stylistic foil. He had trouble with tall unorthodox boxers with speed. Marshall demonstrated this in his victory over Liston, Machen disrupted Liston’s malevolent intentions by staying away and made him look one-dimensional and ponderous. Angelo Dundee took notes and was convinced early that Cassius Clay had a surplus of essentials necessary to thwart Liston. Clay was taller, had demon speed, mobility, and more power and physical strength than either Marshall or Machen. Clay also forced Liston to turn and constantly reset; and was smart enough to circle left, away from that big jab and left hook. In a peak-for-peak battle between 1959 Liston and 1967 Ali, Ali must be favored. He had the answers.

    But there are no supermen. Ali himself was not immune to good strategy and stylistic kryptonite. Master strategist Eddie Futch shined a light on them. Frazier’s high pressure, bobbing and weaving style with that left hook emphasis would always have been problematic for Ali. Ali needed room, had real limitations inside and habitually dropped his right hand. Tyson, who was essentially a gamma-powered Frazier, would also have been problematic for Ali. Marciano knew how to find his way inside and do heavy damage, though there is a good chance that Ali’s corkscrew shots would make marinara out of his face. Bowe was trained by Eddie Futch and that alone could pose problems. If the contest discussed here included rematches, then Ali could be counted on to defeat anyone the second time if not the first. As it is, I’d argue that his record against his peers would place second.

    Larry Holmes’s style of fighting most resembles Ali’s, but he had neither the speed of hand and foot nor the virtuosity that Ali had. Unfortunately, he was prone to punch wide and engage, and these would be mistakes against Liston. Holyfield had skills to match Liston, but he was prone to make the same mistake as Holmes –engaging a superior offensive force. The heavyweights, as a rule, seek victory less by finesse than by strength and power compared to other divisions. It is unlikely that any of the champions will beat 1959 Liston by the usual means. Those are his terms. Still more ominous is the high-tech engine beneath the artillery. Simply put, Liston may be too powerful for the skilled champions and too skilled for the powerful champions. To beat him, it takes a rare breed of heavyweight –the rarest, the Greatest.

    Let us revisit the question: If all of the linear heavyweight champions of the modern era faced each other in their respective primes, who would be the king of the hill?"
     
  3. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,562
    Dec 18, 2004
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,063
    Mar 21, 2007
    Spoilsport.
     
    KeedCubano likes this.
  5. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,562
    Dec 18, 2004
    Sorry mate, off to be in a minute and felt like getting to the point.

    Carry on...
     
  6. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    If not Liston, maybe Foreman.

    Btw, nice poll options. :yep
     
  7. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,139
    13,093
    Jan 4, 2008
    All kinds of excuses are made for the Liston who lost to Clay, and even though he probably had passed his peak, wasn't very well prepared and underestimated Clay, not much is said of Clay just being 22, not having much experience nor the full confidence he'd get after the victory, and never having faced such a formidable challenge before.

    Liston certainly looks great in fantasy H2H-match-ups, but being beaten so soundly by a young Clay certainly keeps him out of the top spot here.
     
    Flash24 and Cecil like this.
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,223
    Feb 15, 2006
    OK.

    Liston was about as close to the perfect heavyweight wrecking machine as you could get physicaly and tacticaly, apart from handspeed.

    Unfortunately handspeed is a prety crucial variable, and it could determine who go their head handed to them if the fight was with sombody like Dempsy or Louis.

    I have never played golf on principle, and am the Eric Crumble of tenis. Still I have to say no.
     
  9. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    26
    May 16, 2006
    speed is vital when fighting the very best. you can be slow and look good against crap or similar speed fighters. calzaghe main assett was his speed against the very best - it matters a lot when fighting the best. a peak tyson matches up better than a peak liston cuz of the speed factor. ali extra speed made liston look slow. Patterson stayed in-close which is suicide against liston. fighters who like to stay in-close like frazier and marciano don't match well against a liston or a foreman. holmes and ali are favs against liston cuz of their punch moving at distance style, lewis staying on the outside i favour - also tunney could prevail. but liston wouldn't be an easy fight for anyone.
     
  10. rm36

    rm36 Active Member Full Member

    1,311
    8
    Jun 26, 2009
    I don't think it's a ridiculous proposition. For years he essentially terrorized the division. But, there are quite a few questions. How would he have done against extremely skilled big men like Lewis and Bowe ? How would he have fared against a great technician like Louis, who also had handspeed. How would he have handled a Tyson onslaught ? How would he have coped with the pressure of Frazier, or the power of George ?

    To all these questions, I'm not so sure. I guess I just have a clearer sense of what Ali of 1967 would have done, and that's why I rank him higher.
     
    Gatekeeper likes this.
  11. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    I'd sooner agree with Liston not being in the top 15 head to head, than number 1. I see him losing 2/3 against:

    Ali
    Holmes
    Lewis
    Foreman
    Frazier
    Louis
    Marciano
    Bowe
    Tyson
    Holyfield
    Vitali Klitschko
    Wladimir Klitschko

    Possibly a couple of others too.
     
  12. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    If we took the top 25 HW fighters in terms of ability in history and they all fought each other in a round robin tournament:

    Mike Tyson would have the fewest losses. Then Lennox Lewis, Muhammad Ali and Larry Holmes.
     
  13. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    I believe that Larry Holmes is the most perfectly balanced of the modern heayweights although not the most gifted but certainly less likely to making mistakes than Ali, a better right cross as he puts more behind it, and more of the killer instinct
     
  14. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    I prefer Tyson in a head to head tournament.
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,814
    44,475
    Apr 27, 2005

    No doubt at all for me.

    But i am VERY confident Liston stops Frazier and Foreman, just for starters.

    I think Holmes and Lewis beat him, for seconds.