Live Fast, Die Young: The Life and Times of Harry Greb

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by klompton2, Aug 22, 2013.


  1. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Addendum: Of course Greb lost a controversial decision to Tiger Flowers
    just at 160 pounds, middleweight limit...
     
  2. Chuck1052

    Chuck1052 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,979
    627
    Sep 22, 2013
    Let me say that I have been a big admirer of Harry Greb for about forty years. As a result, I tried to read everything about him that I could get my hands on, especially during the 1970s and 1980s. He was truly a marvel as a fighter. But I also think that Sugar Ray Robinson was the best pound-for-pound fighter ever with Greb being in the top two or three in the same category. Robinson had his faults. But over a span of more than twenty years, Robinson was facing top fighters, piling up a tremendous record along the way.

    - Chuck Johnston
     
  3. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    It all depends on how we define "greatest P4P fighter" ? I have Ray Robinson as the" greatest all around fighter " along with the marvelous
    lightweight Benny Leonard who was as great a lightweight as Ray Robinson was a welterweight according to people who saw them both in their primes.
    But a Harry Greb though not as beautiful to watch had unique qualities that were never duplicated before or after such as tremendous handspeed,
    great scooting ability never in one spot to time him, amazing stamina, along with the great chin to absorb occasionally punches from much heavier
    LHs and Hwts. As one opponent described the frenetic Greb after being stopped by him " it seemed the ceiling opened up and a carload of gloves came pouring over me ". And as we know Greb beat much heavier men time after time, and aside from his prelim days was never stopped in about
    275 bouts...So on the basis of having the ability to challenge and beat
    much heavier men than he, much more so than the great Ray Robinson
    who knew his limitations, I have Harry Greb who truly feared no one,
    and beat everyone heavier he fought as the P4P best...One for the ages...
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Robert Villemain beat them both, and then Steve Belloise beat Villemain convincingly. I wouldn't count on LaMotta or Gavilan beating Belloise. So it could be one of them ?
    Of course LaMotta and Gavilan more famous. But I know we're not swayed by fame.

    Robinson beat a lot of good fighters, not sure who I'd call the best of them.
     
  5. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,969
    2,412
    Jul 11, 2005
    A fight that was so close, according to reports, than a draw would have been the most just decision. Had Rene Ouimet given his only even round to Gavilan, or scored one of Villemain's round even, it would have been a draw.
     
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,431
    9,419
    Jul 15, 2008
    Possible but debatable ... either way, Greb fought far better top fighters than Ray did ...
     
  7. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    Better and bigger which is why his status as P4P is hard to question. He actually showed how great he was across a wide range of weights. Robinson wasnt as good when he stepped up.
     
  8. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,969
    2,412
    Jul 11, 2005
    To me Kid Gavilan is an all-time Top 10 P4P. I honestly don't see on Greb's resume a win comparable to Ray's two wins over Gavilan. Even though I rank Greb (#3) ahead of Robinson (#5).
     
  9. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    To each his own but I think thats overrating Gavilan. I dont think Gavilan was a better welterweight or pound for pound fighter than Mickey Walker and Greb gave him a beating when he was well past his prime. I also dont think he was better than Mike Gibbons, even the 1919 Gibbons that Greb beat. No, I think there several fighters on Greb's record that were better than Gavilan. Im not even sure Gavilan was the best fighter on Robinson's resume.
     
  10. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Senya, I hope you are joking...Ray Robinson's 2 close defeats of the same weighted Kid Gavilan doesn't come close to Greb's whipping such bigger and stronger men than Gene Tunney, Tommy gibbons, Tommy loughran, Jack Dillon, Battling Levinsky, Billy Miske, Maxie Rosenbloom, Gunboat Smith, Kid Norfolk etc, all who outweighed Greb by many pounds...And how Greb soundly beat a prime Mickey Walker, while way past his peak, one year before he retired was a great feat...Evidently you believe that giving up 10-20 pounds to great fighters like Greb did, doesn't trump Robinson beating the WW Gavilan in 2 close decisions .? Strange...
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,600
    46,234
    Feb 11, 2005
    Whoa Chachi!

    Gavilan top 10 P4P? You are getting more than a bit over you ski's on the Hawk. He had a great career, probably top 50 or 60, had some rough decisions, but he also lost plenty.

    I would say Gene Tunney and Tommy Gibbons are both superior fighters.
     
  12. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,969
    2,412
    Jul 11, 2005
    Which wins on Mickey Walker's welterweight resume should impress me that much to have him ahead of Gavilan? As for Mike Gibbons, as great as he was, he was slipping by the time he met Greb, as the following bouts with Jeff Smith and Mike O'Dowd proved. While we are at it, do you know what 'secondary referee' is? This thing had me puzzled about the Gibbons-O'Dowd bout, what task did George Barton and Ed Shave have in that no-decision bout?
    "George Barton, Minneapolis, and Ed L. Shave, St. Paul, sport writers, who acted as secondary referees, both gave the fight to O'Dowd." (AP)
     
  13. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,969
    2,412
    Jul 11, 2005
    To me Kid Gavilan should be higher on the all-time P4P list than any of the fighters you listed.

    A lot of his losses I consider highly controversial. Tunney and T. Gibbons superior fighters? You gotta be kidding.
     
  14. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,969
    2,412
    Jul 11, 2005
    And I didn't say 'best win', I consider Gavilan to be the 'best fighter' Robinson beat. That is, even Henry Armstrong, despite that bout not meaning much if anything, would be among the 'best fighters' Robinson beat.
     
  15. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    Ill take losses to all time great fighters like Smith and ODowd over losses to Villemain and and Costner (both of which followed close on the heels of Gavilan's bout with Robinson) any day of the week. Particularly when you realize that Gibbons lost to Smith just two weeks after having to go 10 hard rounds with Greb. He certainly wasnt disgraced in his loss to ODowd which was called a draw by both the Minneapolis Trib and Minneapolis Journal. The St. Paul Pioneer Press called it a close bout.

    The newspapers I have refer to Barton and Shade as "judges." Since no decision was being rendered I can only assume that they were ringside acting as a second, official, pair of eyes in the event of fouls, etc. that might be missed by the referee.

    As for Walker's resume "at welterweight" he beat Dave Shade twice, Jack Britton (still one hell of a good fighter when Walker defeated him), Pete Latzo, Lew Tendler, Jock Malone, Mike McTigue, and Bert Colima to name a few off the top of my head. But Walker was a better all around fighter from the top of his resume to the bottom. Walker was to Gavilan what Greb was to Robinson, both great fighters but one has a better resume from top to bottom and proved his pound for pound status by actually moving up successfully and beating much larger men. Gavilan was even less successful at that than Robinson was.

    I think there is definately an argument for Tunney and Gibbons being better than Gavilan. I dont know if I would agree with that argument but some could make it and have valid points. BUT, could Robinson or Gavilan beat Tunney or Gibbons? I doubt it. I dont think either one of them could beat Tunney. The best shot they would have of beating Gibbons was when he was younger and fighting at MW. But who beat Gibbons at MW? Nobody. When he moved up to LHW in 1920 he had been fighting as a MW for nine years and hadnt lost a decision either newspaper or official.