Lloyd Honeyghan V Terence Crawford ?

honey > terry so far, on any given night

 

at his best yes though not that onesided, but that does sound a little tokyo dougie. Yet Honey at his best took down elites without trouble... he just couldnt maintain that level beyond a few years.

We havent seen the best of terry yet, lets wait till hes tested at elite level a few times. Boxers should be judged once the finish their careers, in my book.

 

To early to say, right now? Honey by UD, but he's at his best, I'm not sure what Crawfords best is yet

 

Lloyd was the real deal. By the Starling fight he was diminishing and that was a bad style for him.

 

Honeyghan was 2,000 light years better than Horn, and it's still a question if Crawford can handle a good sized welter who's actual quality.

At this point, I'd favor Honeyghan. I think his style would be a problem for Crawford.