Lockett Says Pavlik Is Beatable

The question is Pavlik beatable? :blood

 

awsome, your Armenian too im guessing?

 

No, his competition isn't even close to Calzaghe's.

And he recieves no bashing, mostly he's overrated.

 

Lockett is like a poor mans Pavlik. Decent punch, decent chin, pretty straight forward fighting style and very beatable.

 

Actually yes. Please dont tell me you forgot Taylor beat Hopkins, the same Hopkins that JC has been salivating to fight btw.

 

In what manner did Taylor beat Hopkins? And do you think I'm going to give Calzaghe any credit for beating Hopkins unless he totally dominates him?

 

Gawd bro get off Calzaghe 8==D~! Isnt even close to Calzaghes competition? Youre a joke.

 

By winning more rounds, last time i checked thats a way to win in a boxing match.:yep

 

Age has little to do with anything, Pavlik is as good as he's going to get.

 

McKart, Zertuche, Miranda & Taylor is close to -

Eubank, Reid, Woodhall, Sheika, Mitchell, Veit, Lacy & Kessler.

Please.

 

I say that because he has no room for improvement, he's likely at his physical peak and there are no extra intangibles like speed and amazing timing that could make him any better.

He is what he is.

He'd have virtually no chance vs. Calzaghe and would lose to any top SMW.

 

This content is protected

What's 'Chug Life'? and why has the letter 'I' been replaced with a carrot?

 

Yeah just like any other fighter.

 

Mitchell was no stiff, get your facts straight.

 

What stiffs are you talking about?

1-0-1 with Girard in Girard's homeland?

A KO win over Liles.

2 wins over Siaca.

A robbery loss to Sven Ottke.

Then a KO loss to Calzaghe.

What stiffs did he lose to? He won the linear title from Liles by knockout and then got an undeserved loss to Ottke.