LOL ''calzaghe's a bit a thick'' froch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by faisal, Dec 12, 2008.


  1. faisal

    faisal Hoolios daddy Full Member

    4,980
    2
    Feb 24, 2007
  2. treva1977

    treva1977 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    3
    May 23, 2008
    joe was a bit rude as it was a good fight.
    but that does not put froch in the same league as calzaghe.
    froch needs to avoid kessler and calzaghe if he intends to keep the belt for a while.
    taylor will be the next test for froch and if he can win that ,will be valuable experience.
     
  3. dmh1976

    dmh1976 Real Fight Club Member Full Member

    36
    0
    Nov 21, 2007
    Kessler vs Froch. That would be a sweet fight.

    Make it happen.
     
  4. sugar_ray

    sugar_ray Guest

    calzaghe is a bit thick. seems to be lacking something up there
     
  5. One Round

    One Round Hertfordshire's Finest Full Member

    2,964
    15
    Nov 24, 2008
    Lets see them both get another belt each and then meet up in a unification battle. That would be the biggest thing in European boxing since Calzaghe-Kessler. Plus Froch would stand more of a chance against Kessler (who i see winning) coming off a win against an elite fighter such as Taylor.
     
  6. brickfists

    brickfists The Nonpareil Full Member

    8,666
    7
    Nov 19, 2008
  7. dmh1976

    dmh1976 Real Fight Club Member Full Member

    36
    0
    Nov 21, 2007
    Did you know Froch went into the Pascal fight with a cracked rib and perforated ear drum? He still put in an excellent and entertaining fight.


    Such performance deserves respect! No matter what kind of guy he's supposed to be.
     
  8. kingofcali

    kingofcali Member Full Member

    438
    1
    Dec 9, 2009
    Pay attention!

    I can't stand Joe Calzaghe but he's worth ten of Carl Froch!

    Froch is a "novice" paper champion who just beat a guy who was outside the top 20 in the Independent Ratings and had never fought a world class opponent.

    Case closed! Calzaghe is a ***** but Froch is a bigger ***** with "miraculously" an even bigger mouth!
     
  9. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
  10. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    39
    Nov 19, 2004
    Thick? Nah.

    Jealous as hell? Definitely.

    Which is ridiculous, there's no way Calzaghe should be, but everything fits with that.
    He slogged along with his WBO trinket for years to no fanfare, while here comes Froch and with one fight and one belt gets plaudits. Joe's pissed.
     
  11. sitiyzal

    sitiyzal ................. Full Member

    4,387
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    Calzaghe's either thick as pig**** or a colossal hypocrite. Or Both?
     
  12. sugar_ray

    sugar_ray Guest

    both. i think he believes what he says but does not understand that he was one of these paper champs etc. he probably dont even know what hypocrisy means.
     
  13. barrington

    barrington Active Member Full Member

    882
    0
    Mar 17, 2008
  14. sugar_ray

    sugar_ray Guest

    calzaghe: why would i fight carl froch? he doesnt mean anything. he means nothing in america he means nothing to hbo...
    hahaha when did mr calzaghe started to care about america and hbo? he is hilarious
     
  15. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    love it where calzaghe says Froch is arrogant unlike Naz who said what he said "with a funniness about it"!

    Froch is hilarious