LOL! GBP moves in and takes TMT's Gamboa-Direll date like a BOSS

I don't have faith in government. Honestly the only reason why I'm supporting Romney is because of his business background, but the "I will fight Marijuana till the end" statement is making me question his willingness to be open minded and humility to learn. I'm still rooting for him though.

 

More boxing= Boxing fans win! :good

 

Maybe they could fight on HBO and GBP could put on a good show as well.. That sounds like a winner to me!

 

Exactly. I don't mind watching boxing all over the place on the same night. Hell, hopefully Solo Boxeo does something too.

 

Agree fully !

I also hate when people complain of this. If 2 cards run side by side not only is there more boxing on , but each promoter is forced to up their game, you gotta have the better undercard or else they people will switch over.

 

:good My DVR will be locked and loaded!

 

Whoooo competing promoters. Love missing fights because of their pissing contests :happy

 

I think its certain specific individuals with agendas who are mad. I'm sure Fiddy is mad.

 

Get with the times brah. Get cable.

 

I think his business background is better suited for the private sector. One thing I look for is leadership qualities, almost above anything else. I mean, in all honsty, no job in the world will prep one for the POTUS. So to me, it comes down to other qualities. And I really don't see them in Romney. Just my opinion, but he just seemd too fridgid, like he cannot wait to get back to his own peeps. Thank god he's gonna lose though. I don't think there's any dounts about that.

 

Same here. Precisely wat the DVR was made for! :good

 

I have cable. I just think its dumb that promoters compete when boxing isn't even doing well

 

i wanted TMT do b on a major network .

 

It's not competing if youre going to watch both.

It's not like a PPV on the same night where the consumer pays $60 per fight.

Its free on TV.

 

I have checked sources, I also provided you my rationale for why their proclamations are worthless. Something you haven't even tried to refute.

The fed is actually an independent body, it is supposed to be checked by the government though, but in truth it is a private organization that has complete control of US banking. It is the money maker and generator. Like I said the US bank, there is really only one, is still rolling and not in danger of folding anytime soon.

Your current government is no where close to my economic ideal, it is just as far away as the current US system and the Europoean system. You cry a great deal about propaganda, but you have yet to inform me of any of the great truths that you seem to know. Enlighten me please. I have studied a great deal of economics, principaly of the Austrian variety. Like I said, you say the Keynesian arguments but looks as if you haven't looked at the historical failure of it in practice.

Oh this is funny without central banking we live in caves, then do explain out when the US was on the gold-coin standard it was one of the fastest growing economies in the history of the world and was far from being a poor nation with no means of its citizens to live and profit and expand.

So you accept the argument that it is ok for a thief to steal money to pay someone who owes them because if they can't steal they can't pay off their debtor. I don't follow that ideology. If the US wants to pay off its debt, before stealing from the people it should liquidate its assets and stop spending money.

Actually I'm not in favor of supply-side economics and have not advocated it in the slightest. I don't think you understand what supply-side economics is or you don't understand my economic ideology.

Leaving social issues in the hand of charity and the private sector isn't supply-side economics. I think it has been confirmed that you do not know what supply-side economics means and entails.

Yes the health care panals and lack of access are propaganda, you say this with a straight face while ignoring a clear example I gave you in the same post. :rofl:rofl

----

You are funny man. The worst part is that I think you are well intentioned and probably a good student, but you have adopted a wholesale false economic doctrine. If you are interested in a body of economic work that has a better track record in reality than the Keynesian model I will be glad to show you some texts from the Austrian school. That is only if you are hungry to learn.

Like I said before though, if there is soo much wrong please enlighten me. The "propaganda" rebuttal reeks of the "non-believer" chant of religious fundamentalists.

You care about the US not about how US policy effects Canada, which is why you opened the whole line of conversation the way you did, again no need to run away from it now.

The current depression does ignore the lessons garnered from the great depression, the first being government caused the great depression via action through the Fed. which crazily inflated the currency by ramping up the money supply to cause the boom of the 20s, which led to the bust. The second being that government action to "fix" issues actually prolonged the recovery from the bust. We see the same thing in the current recession and the late recession in the 90s under clinton, "the dot-com" bust. This time the government sets interests rates artificially low (below market rate), hyper regulates all business to the event that it encourages malinvestment with guarantees, subsidizing bad investment, and then we have a huge bust. The stimulus's do nothing but drag out the problem because it keeps money still malinvested instead of washing out of ineffective companies and the government creates "programs" that take more capital out of the hands of the earners of said capital further stifling true economic growth.

Like I said we've seen this time and time again and it fails. Canada is enjoying their boom on the government debt spending, but realize the bust is coming. It always does.