LOL! GBP moves in and takes TMT's Gamboa-Direll date like a BOSS

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by iron_chin, Aug 21, 2012.


  1. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    just dont run from them. i picked Dirrell to win. i came close 5 times to throwing bottles at my tv........
     
  2. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
    Wow what a very ill feating metaphor. I won't go too much into politics, but you could easily say it is like poor people voting for democrats. Who have done nothing but promote more poverty in their severely flawed economic understanding.

    I'll leave it at that on the political subject.

    You are right on the stupidity of those so mad at Floyd and 50 that they celebrate potentially losing the ability to see two major fighters show their skill.
     
  3. PabstBlueRibbon

    PabstBlueRibbon She needs the D. Full Member

    565
    1
    Jul 24, 2012
    Lol 50 musta really struck a nerve in Fishnets. Should of known what it could lead to though, smh.
     
  4. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    dont see what the big deal is....they can still have their fight on the date they originally picked...what if golden boys gets cancelled or falls through or they are just full of ****? then TMT would have altered plans for nothing.
     
  5. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007

    Thats some funny ****! I studies Economics for my first degree and I feel sad for you guys because your economic policies for the last 30 years have lead up to the Great Recession. Y'all got everything backwards:bart
     
  6. BodyBlaster

    BodyBlaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,634
    65
    Jul 25, 2007
    I bet you he aint. He's done. He'll be back, built up against a series of tomato cans and then fed to Mayweather in a big money mismatch.
     
  7. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    :yep I just came from my first day of Micro Econ
     
  8. MannySteward

    MannySteward Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,660
    4
    May 1, 2011
    It's not a good thing. Gamboa is too damn exciting to be off for this long. Really disappointed.

    Dirrell. Talented but i don't care for him at all. Bad attitude.
     
  9. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    At the Time AA was not favored, Kessler was, AA moved up from 160 to be in this tourney, and found out he is not a super middleweight. And lets be real Dirrell should have got an oscar for that acting stint, the mother ****er yes fouled hit while his knee was down but it was not that dramatic.

    However to save face, they put out there that his career may be over he has a medical condition this and that, in the end it was all bull****, no medical reports showed any type of career injury, suddenly Dirrell is back and is looking to fight soon... sorry but I cant support that ***** like ****
     
  10. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007

    Nice! Are you majoring in Economics or is it an elective? Most people prefer Macro . . . I loved them both
     
  11. Elliot

    Elliot Boxing Addict banned

    5,304
    0
    Jan 22, 2012
    Getting staggered in standard in a boxing match, I don't feel Froch was under any danger of getting knocked out, just as I feel Dirrell wasn't either at any point in the fight.

    Dirrell did very well at the end, but I had him going in round 11 needing a knock out due to the point deduction.

    The fight wasn't entertaining, he didn't look like an amateur, and finally he didn't outclass him, if you dare put yourself through watching it again you'll see the widest you could score it was 115-112 Dirrell and that is giving every close round to Dirrell which when away from home is completely illogical.

    I think i'll have to agree to disagree with both of you, this fight wasn't easy to score as there were alot of close rounds with very little activity from either fighter, I have always viewed anywhere from Froch-Dirrell 115-112 to 112-115 being fair, Froch won clearly four rounds, Dirrell won five, had a point deducted therefore in regards to scoring won 4, the remaining 3 rounds had very little activity and therefore could be handed to anyone.
     
  12. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    I'm majoring in accounting actually, but I have to take mirco and macro econ to get into the business school. I do enjoy economics though, more than I do accounting actually :lol:
     
  13. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    smart move by 50 calling him girl. LOL
     
  14. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    hope your major isnt accounting, i have several friends who are accountants and they hate there job, life, fellow employees ..... number crunching all day will make one crazy... i'm glad i flunked out of that
     
  15. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    Why are all of the Dirrell fans getting butthurt?

    *He went to Nottingham to fight Froch and spent most of the night running.

    *He outboxed AA but slowed down at the end and embarrassed himself by play acting as he knew AA was coming on strong.

    *He continued to play on his injury to avoid Ward as they are friends.

    *He then wastes the best years of his career by being inactive, including turning down a fight with Bute.

    The guy will never achieve anything in boxing as he has the heart the size of a pea, in contrast a guy with nowhere near the boxing skills in Froch is a 3 time World champion because he has balls.