LOL!!!! Just looked at Pac's last 7 fights and it made me laugh!

What a ******ed post.

 

If you think thats funny you're going to die laughing if you saw Mayweather's last 7 fights.

 

atsch

 

It's pretty easy to spin things around the other way...

In Hatton's previous fight, he decimated Paulie Malignaggi, who was the consensus #2 in the weight class.

Oscar had just gotten done losing only a split decision to the #1 pound for pound fighter in the world.

Diaz was a legitimate beltholder who had just defeated legendary future hall-of-famer Erik Morales.

Marquez was against the #2 pound for pound fighter in the world.

He nearly shut out Barrera, another future hall of famer, who was coming off of two wins over Rocky Juarez and a relatively close loss to the #3 pound for pound fighter in the world.

Solis was just a tune up fight, and still he faced someone who was top 10 in his weight class and who would go on to win a few more big fights before losing a controversial one to titlist Cruz.

Morales was just the third fight in which Pacquiao was avenging his previous loss. He took on a hall of famer to prove who's the best, and he won two out of three.

See, not that hard to spin things the other direction. The truth is somewhere in the middle.

 

You know your boxing.

The moron who started this thread doesn't.

 

The double standards exemplified by your posts are simply stunning.

Almost all resumes can be criticized under intense scrutiny.

Take Cotto for example. You talk **** about Manny's victories over competition that was past prime, yet you include the Shane Mosely and Zab Judah from 2007 as great wins???

You criticize Manny's win over Marquez stating Marquez was the real winner and then turn around and say Clottey was a great win for Cotto when the consensus is that Clottey deserved the win.

Yeah let's talk **** about Jorge Solis and David Diaz but then you forget about the lesser opponents that Cotto has faced recently, ie Gomez, Jennings, Urkal.

Bottomline: your analysis is biased and flawed.

In other words: You Fail.

 

:deal

 

******ed post

 

:rofl

 

Lakers2432, what you've just posted is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for opening this thread. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

 

Paulie Malignaggi who was brutalized by Cotto, got a gift against Lovemore Ndou and Herman Ngoudjo!!!

Also Hatton was already KO by Mayweather, and nearly KO by a shot Lazcano.

Also, Oscar had just got done filling his veins with IV. Weight drained to hell, 36 years old, and fighting in a weightclass he hadn't seen in a decade!

Diaz was a title holder who received his title against a SHOT Morales in a CONTREVERSIAL fight!

Yeah, he was, and most philipino media outlets had JMM winning, including ******* hero "Pacdbest" had it a draw!

Barrera was on his 18th year as a pro and had been in more wars than the U.S. wars combined!!!

Solis is a B level fighter, nothing more.

Morales was just the third fight in which Pacquiao was avenging his previous loss. He took on a hall of famer to prove who's the best, and he won two out of three.

Yeah, "GREAT resume!"

 

yeah and a year ago you would have laughed if someone told you that pac was going to beat oscar and hatton and fight in 4 divisions in a space of a year.

 

This content is protected

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

:rofl