Loma is much more attack minded then Mayweather

Relax....it's not that serious kid. This forum is here to talk sensibly and to have debates regarding the sport and its fighters. I enjoy offering other posters my perspective and giving rational arguments to fuel the passion a lot of posters have for the sweet science. I appreciate your forewarning and your pleads, but I think you are out of your depth. I'm happy to hold court if you'd like to drill down beyond a surface level if you'd like.

 

I agree. The Genaro of the Floyd fight was looking incredibly slow and also wasn't game. Mentally and physically, Genaro was just done.
Also, Genaro is at a major stylistic disadvantage vs Floyd.

 

Deformity, you don't pay bills is the point. Us real men can see through your young ass thinking fat boy. Most of us are at work talking to your silly ass.

 

Hernandez is a more accomplished boxer simply because of the names he has on his resume. Losing to DLh, Floyd and in most people's opinions to Nelson has given credibility to Hernandez legacy. Even in the losses having those kinds of names on your resume adds substance to his legacy. Matinez doesn't have those names that can do what Nelson, DLH and Mayweather did for Genaro. Lomo might be a huge name down the line....Maybe Mikey Garcia could be that guy on Martinez resume....the point is to be in a position to win a world title says a lot....actually winning a world title...multiple times validates the level these guys are operating on.

 

Relax? :rofl. You're talking to a grown man dun. Martinez never even beat a world champion. This has nothing to do with anyone liking or disliking Loma either.

 

Paying bills isn't a stress for me, 2 years time I'm a Dentist. 2 years time, you're still the same loser but will be laid off.

 

Well if your a dentist, you should fill in those cavities of boxing knowledge that you're clearing missing.:deal

 

You're a GGG fan you ****ing fool and you have the nerve to say PBF never dared to fight at 160. Hell GGG has never dared to even fight at 168 or dared to even fight someone of note. The double standards you GGG fans are too much log off.

 

In that case let me take off the kid gloves . Lol. Martinez beat world champions. Current and former. Solido was a world champion. You may not have anything against Lomo. But I would argue that you drive a much harder bargain talkin about Lomo as a boxer and his accomplishments thus far in his 7 fight career than you do with other boxers you have brought up in your posts. I can only base my opinion on what you project in your posts. And for me it doesn't seem like you are a fan of Lomo

 

Boxing isn't just about names dun. Martinez never beat a world champion. I don't care which fights you think we're controversial. I thought that Hernandez won. The controversy was the punch Nelson landed after the bell. That's it. Nelson lost because he was loading up and not throwing punches in bunches. Names in losses means little unless it's a Hagler Leonard type decision. Names on your resume when you win mean a lot.

 

that's a good one actually.

 

Loma is the most skilled fighter to fight at 130 since PBF.

 

First off I like Loma, but I recognize that he has a lot more to do before I can talk about him or his win over Martinez. That win is not a big as Genaro's win over Nelson.

There are titlists, former titlists and then there are lineal champions that you had to have beaten. Who did Martinez beat? He didn't beat a lineal world champion to my knowledge. I could be wrong. Who did he beat?

 

He's not a fan of Lomachenko. He has always been discrediting him in the past. Now his performance against Martinez (as well as Loma being a big fan of Floyd) has put the fear of God into him.
He says he's a fan of Loma now, but is using Loma as a disguise to legitimise his obvious racism.

Crawford is not a true P4Per.

 

And if a title is vacated by a champ or a champion retires, you have to unify the titles before you are seen as the new/next lineal champion. Had to throw that in there.