Loma is P4P number 1 by a considerable distance.

Please don't respond to me i lose braincells everytime i read posts like "i watched the fight in slow motion trust me bro" "i have screenshots and gifs trust me bro"

Your whole argument is ridiculous and a total farce backed up with nothing other than your own biased opinion.

Fights are not scored in slow motion or by screenshots lol.

 

11 punches you counted Lopez scoring in round 2….11…punches



You didn’t have any brain cells to begin with

 

Questioning my intelligence when you think your opinion which is a small minority BTW, is valid based on watching a fight in slow motion and using so called screenshots just shows your level of intelligence.

What's funny is you don't even realize how ridiculous you're making yourself look.

 

You don't prefer your scoring method at all. You've brought it here as an aberration.

When you post in the RBR threads you do so in real time, no slow motion in sight.

 

Maybe in your dreams.

Not even close in real life.

 

Yes, well Usyk is just as overrated as Lomachenko. Usyk beat Joshua, after Joshua got knocked out by Andy Ruiz first. Apparently this makes Usyk a ATG at the heavyweight division.

 

You’ve completely lost track of who you are arguing with. What opinion did I share about rounds won? Where did I mention Crawford or Spence? I deliberately did not mention either fighter so you just look like an idiot trying to project an opinion onto me without any evidence that I hold such an opinion. Why would you go down that path? It only serves to discredit your own position.

When you are in a hole pal, all good advice says that you should stop digging.

And also, learn to have a debate and not just shout people down who don’t agree with you. You made your argument on an open forum, you should expect people to put forward opinions that don’t align with yours.

 

Literally only a few posts ago below.. my point raised on this is completely valid

Presumption below is Loma is nowhere near those top p4p fighters..like supposed p4p no.1 Crawford

Where am I shouting? I’ve attempted to debate the other two in a fairly civil manner on countless occasions, but their opinions have continued to not mount to anything much but blind objection

 

You’ve had your pants pulled down by claiming Lopez landed 11 punches in round 2. I recall you saying this previously I asked for you to show me, and you just ignored. I timestamped all punches Lopez landed in that round, he categorically does not land more than 4-5

You can act like I’m the stupid one, and you’re free to do so, but if I’m stupid I don’t know what that makes you. You’re debating rounds that essentially, from your 11 punches claim, you haven’t even watched.

You haven’t even watched a round and you’re claiming Loma lost it.. sounds like someone doesn’t like Loma for some reason

 

Haney was over 160 vs Loma

 

Floyd

 

The two fighters I mentioned as my P4P guys were Usyk and Inoue. At no point have I mentioned Crawford. Not once.

Also, my problem is not with your opinion that Loma is number one P4P. This is a legitimate opinion. My problem is with the notion that he is so far ahead of everyone else that it’s not open for debate (refer to thread title). It is absolutely open for debate. It’s so open for debate in fact that most people in here don’t even have Loma at number one P4P at all, let alone by a considerable margin.

 

You say things without saying anything

You score based on inaccurate judgement then claim it’s easy to score. I claim based on an accurate run through of the round as to what lands.

In your scenario, there’s a fight XYZ , fighter A wins 5 clear rounds. In two of the rounds, because of camera angles and speed of the punches it’s very difficult to see fighter A land his punches and fighter B looks like he lands punches, but he doesn’t and is outlanded by fighter A. You give fighter B these rounds.

 

LOL

 

My pants pulled down ? You're still ranting about decision that was from almost 4 years ago, because you can't accept the fact that one of your favourite fighters lost fair and square that in itself makes you look silly.

I don't care about your assumptions on what you deem what is or isn't a landed punch lol it means diddly squat, the fact you have to go through all these mental gymnastics to try and make a case for Lomachenko is laughable.

"it's a fact because i watched it in slow motion bro" "it's a fact because i have screenshots and gifs bro"

I watched the fight in real time like a normal person and scored it clearly for Lopez as did the 3 judges, as did a majority of boxing fans, and the statistics back up my argument as do the 3 judges and the opinion of the vast majority of the boxing community.

I don't need to play your silly game because your so called "facts" have no weight it's just your opinion which is a minority not backed up by any evidence apart from your biased agenda.

Last time we had this discussion last year you asked me to watch the round and i did i can quote you where i scored it clearly for Lopez.

Read above get over it it's not healthy to keep obsessing over something this long its time move on my guy, watching it in reverse watching it in slow motion watching it upside down isn't going to reverse the decision.

I'm a big Marquez fan and didn't like when he lost to Bradley but i still admitted he lost the decision fair and square even if it was competitive.