Loma would do well vs prime Floyd

Agree about Pac.

But Lomachenko-Mayweather is a 50/50 fight.

 

Both at their absolute best would be a dream contest for the purists. I'll pick Floyd

 

Not a chance.

 

Great thread.
It depends on which version of Mayweather we're talking about here.
One version he displayed masterful offense. The other, defense.

 

I’d go with Floyd… Loma never really impressed me like he has so many others .

He lost to Salido, and he lost to Lopez.
I think he would have lost to Floyd in a competitive fight but Floyd at 130 was a lost more aggressive and IMO just a better all around fighter who is smarter in the ring and more adaptable then Loma.

Loma is a really good fighter while Floyd is a great fighter.

 

Here we go again with this "tbe" bs..

Floyds entire career was based on opportunism, card stacking, and cherrypicking.

The only thing Floyd has on Loma is size. Granted that could easily be enough to get him the W. But Loma is undeniably more skilled.

I know its different weight classes and styles but if Castillo and Maidana gave Floyd fits and arguably won, Loma has more than a chance (at 130-135 obviously).

Absolute state of the morons who continue to fool for the clear as day manufactured hype.

 

Floyd always won with these kind of scores, even when he lost.

 

I've seen all of his fights and he only lost once...to Castillo.

 

You might not hate Loma, but you are definitely a Mayweather worshipper judging by your comments. Do you wake up every morning bowing down to Mayweather like some kind of a god and savior? You project your own worship of another mortal human-being which happens to be Mayweather, onto Lomachenko fanatics by calling them 'Lomasexuals'. How about you start from yourself and stop being a Mayweather worshipper first and foremost, before whining about Lomasexuals overrating Lomachenko? Since that's exactly what you're doing with Mayweather here, as if he's some kind of a perfect figure. You lose any right to complain about Lomasexuals until you stop worshipping Mayweather.

Anyhow, tell us why Mayweather's performance was any better against Castillo compared to Lomachenko's performance against Lopez? I can immediately tell you Mayweather couldn't adapt or adjust against Castillo in the first fight, hence he needed the rematch in the first place.

Whereas Lomachenko was the one landing the vast majority of the clean blows on Teofimo Lopez, whilst Lopez was missing most of his. Video evidence here proves this:

This content is protected

If you still insist that fight wasn't close AT THE VERY LEAST, not only do you expose yourself as a hater, but delusional and a danger to society for not being able to admit what is blatantly taking place in the world right in front of our own eyes. It's good grounds for even getting someone banned TBH.

And also, if you're going to respond by saying "but it was only a 4 minute video cherry-picking Lomachenko's best moments', do us a favor and provide a counter video that shows us Lopez landing more clean punches.

Thank you!

 

I'd rather be a 'troll', than be worshipping another fellow mortal human being. If you're an adult, you must be one pathetic excuse of a human being.

 

LOL...

I was giving you the benefit of the doubt but I am mistaken. You are worse than a troll, you are clueless.

 

Yh, stylistically Loma would be problematic for Mayweather's slow paced counter-punching style (ALA Ricky Hatton). But size and reach advantage may play a factor here for Mayweather.

 

Nah. He wouldn't.