Lomachencko VS Walters...Fighter vs Runner???

You're an idiot. I'm a big fan of Lomachenko, Rigondeaux and Ward. Ward fights a little bit like Lomachenko but without the combinations and power, Rigondeaux fights nothing like the others. You don't know boxing.
When does Lomachenko potshot? He throws his combinations and counter punches on the front foot.

 

Yeah, I'm not getting the potshot thing either. Lomas combis are a thing of beauty, and the running thing? His description of loma to fill his narrative didn't work at all.

 

Nice screen name!

 

Lomachenko will beat Walters and anyone else in his weight division.....................he is a very good boxer..................funny............when Void cheats, lies, holds, runs, gets to take pain shots while Pac was not allowed to, that's boxing?! After watching Void/Pac nobody should ever say anything about Klitschcko, at least Klitschko knocks a lot of his opponents out.............

 

Absolutely clueless. You can be a runner, it means moving away without thinking about your offence. Lomachenko moves to set up his offence or to reset. Guys like Floyd and Dirrell often move purely to avoid contact. I am a fan of Dirrell but he does run at times.
When has Lomachenko ever given any indication he might duck someone? That's the opposite of what he's about and it's his promoter who wants Walters in October. Lomachenko is his new cash cow, he knows what's going to happen when the unproven and overhyped Walters steps in with Loma. Arum wants it to happen soon because he knows his boy Walters could get shown up before Loma gets to him if he delays it.

 

His 1st loss he ran ,body shots galore.

 

Egis Klimas in an interview with ***********:

"We have started negotiations with the team of Nickolas Walters. Now we are only at the beginning, but we really want to make this fight happen. It will be a great event. Of course, it does not have full confidence in the success of the transaction. Walters must first pass the dangerous Colombian Miguel Marriagu in June "

 

One big difference between Rigo and Loma is that the Ukranian is truly fun to watch whereas Rigo is iike a sleeping pill.
Sure,Rigo is an elite fighter,an outstanding master of his craft,but this is the pro business where money is the name of the game.
Markebility,a fighter's charisma,his passport,his style,the entertainment factor,and so on are all things which are important parts of our beloved sport,the pro game.
A fighter's goal is to make money in as short a time as possible.Rigo lacks some of the above mentioned factors.A pity for him as he is a truly great fighter,an outstanding one,but lets be honest there are not a lot of people out there who really want to watch his fights.
Fair? Of course not!

 

Lomachenko deserves credit for his incredible huge jump of faith into the pro game taking on a very good and experienced fighter like Salido in his first outing at the pros.How many fights has Loma had up till now???
As far as I can remember Walters didnt face anyone near as good as Salido in his pro debut,or did he.
Pah! I take my hat off to Loma for the way he has climbed up the latters ath the pro in as short a time as he did!
I would have advised him to beat 10-12 no-hopers and journeymen before he took on someone like Salido.I am glad now that I didnt advise him

 

Walters is in no way a runner.

 

He's not boring or a runner. You don't know what the fuq you're talking about.