From my personal view, Pedraza took Lomachenko more seriously and performed better than when he fought Tank. In this fight, though he was beaten every round, he tried to give everything he got. Against Tank, he looked a bit unprepared, surprised and hesitant.
Wake up man, Loma only used his right jab for the first 10 rounds, he was clearly taking it easy and just trying to win without putting his right arm at risk, Loma's best weapon is the right uppercut probably and he didn't use it a single time in the first 10 rounds because he was managing his injury.
Floyd went 12 with guys like Berto, DeMarcus Corley, Carlos Rios and Gregorio Vargas. Some of them UDs happened earlier in his career and some when he was older.
All greats had fights where they looked bad and went the distance. I don't know if Loma is great yet, but to say greats don't have bad fights or decisions is not true. It is the totality of the career and who they fought and beat in that career.
There are some flaws in Loma which are clear. He is busy and energetic to the point where without that energy he becomes average. He is open to a right uppercut and sort of a left hook if someone can jab to the body and head and throw the hook. He gets under it usually but if he is hit with a jab, which he can be that could change that. He is so busy and fast guys don't have a chance to counter him they are overwhelmed, but eventually they will. 10 more tough fights and this style shows wear and tear.
'All time great' Floyd Mayweather Jr needed 12 rounds to beat a guy named 'Larry O'Shields', who has 12 losses and 17 wins out of 32 bouts. And has 5 knockout losses. Jose Pedraza > Larry O'Shields Floyd Mayweather also needed 12 rounds to beat a guy named Gustavo Fabien Cuello who has a record of 21 losses, 5 KO losses and 23 wins. Jose Pedraza only had one loss and one knockout loss prior to facing Lomachenko and had 25 wins. Thus, Jose Pedraza > Gustavo Fabien Cuello. Therefore, Lomachenko going 12 rounds against Jose Pedraza whilst shutting Pedraza out > Floyd Mayweather Jr going 12 rounds against those above bums who are proven to be inferior to Pedraza. As for Roberto Duran, he went 12 rounds against a guy named 'Eduardo Frutos' who has a record of 21 losses, 5 by knockout and only 10 wins. In other words, he is SIGNIFICANTLY inferior to Jose Pedraza. And in other words, Lomachenko shutting out Pedraza and winning via 12 rounds decision > Roberto Duran going 12 rounds to beat that bum that is 'Eduardo Frutos'. I could do the same thing with Chavez Jr but you get the point! So your first sentence in your original post has been THOROUGHLY debunked!
The OP is right. He's not comparable. In 13 fights, he's gone 11-1 in world title fights, won titles across three divisions, and he's 7-1 against current or former champs. He tied the record for fewest fights to win a world title and set it for winning world titles in two and three divisions. His opponents, in total, have only lost 31 times going in to their fights with Loma, and he's already P4P number one. Apparently, being the fastest ever for things is a bad thing now. Who needs guys who do historical stuff right off the bat like Inoue and Loma?
Loma made his opponent 'no mas'. Duran, on the other hand, is the pioneer of 'no mas' and an undisputed champion in this category.
"He is busy and energetic to the point where without that energy he becomes average" ??????????? "10 more tough fights and this style shows wear and tear." Loma has the least wear and tear out of any fighter probably, he barely gets punches, his only tough fight where he got some damage was the Linares fight but yesterday Pedraza did not land one hard shot on Lomachenko in 12 rounds.
These threads, the day after an elite fighter has a routine win, which try and place that boxer in their historical context based on a rudimentary performance are as predictable as night following day (Unless you live close to either of the poles for which you have my greatest sympathy). It's the over-eagerness which is the funniest, like they postpone the morning self-pleasuring ritual to get straight to the keyboard to bash out something else entirely.... beige, vanilla musings of utter nothingness... Loma won. In second gear. I'll judge his career when it's done and dusted. Next.
Man your IQ must be below 70 . Loma is featherfisted and so was floyd . Floyd UD’d many bums and in such a boring fashion that his biggest fans will never remember any of those fights.
Recovery From Surgery On The Labrum The recovery from labral tear surgery is long and quite annoying. Most of you who are undergoing a labral repair or labrum reconstruction is having the cartilage tissue sewn back against the bone. Although we put anchors into the bone and utilize them to reattach your labrum you need to wait until the labral tear actually heals back to the bone – which takes a minimum of 8 to 12 weeks – before you can start to put any significant stress on your shoulder. Surgery on the labrum generally involves a period of immobilization or the use of a sling. It may involve very light, gentle physical therapy if the surgeon finds that your shoulder might be getting stiff, however, you should not stress full range of motion of your shoulder, nor should you return to any overhead activities or weightlifting, until you have been given the go-ahead to do so by your surgeon. Many failures are the result of noncompliance (you not listening to your doctor and not following the instructions of your surgeon, or therapy that has become too aggressive, too soon. Even when you do follow your physician’s instructions, and even if a repeat MRI shows that the labrum is healed, you may still have some residual symptoms (pain). Many times, that’s because there was probably something else that was bothering you shoulder – – – or simply the fact that restoration of “normal” function – – – following a labral repair, is frequently not possible.
All the guys you listed are miles bigger than Loma. Like asking why didn't Floyd stop Canelo and old De La Hoya in his 5th weight division.
