Lomachenko or Mayweather - who's had the better COMBINED amateur and pro career OVERALL?

The 396-1 record is bologna. Not his gold medals.

 

I really do not care.
The more ammy tournaments you had in adult division, the more damn hard training camps and pre fight camps you will have under belt, not alone fights.
The more= the worse for remaining mileage for body at all.
From one point there is mandatory to have exp with adults before going into a pro.
From the same point: the more adult fights under amateur rules, the lesser you will have remaining for pro career.
Health in combat arts is considered as usable resource.

Valuable things from amateur rules ranks are: really notable cups, any medals at Oly, Wolrd, Continental level.
Regardless from number of fights.

 

No one with any intellectual credibility has ever said Floyd lost fair and square in the olympics not even his opponent who knew it was a farce. You are pathetic scum. Brainwashed by dickless losers who think the whole world is a lie except your little disgraceful bubble you imagine it to be.pathetic.

 

This must be a joke, Loma legacy is laughable compared to Mayweather's.

 

Mayweather and it’s not close.

 

Floyd Mayweather Jr. is ahead by infinity.

There is zero chance that Va-SILLY Lose-a-chenko can catch up to Mayweather. Absolutely zero chance of that ever happening.

 

Loma's am career is outstanding. But the Pro records take the drivers seat in this. Floyd easy.

 

Lomachenko was an otherworldly amateur, and a terrific pro.

The pro game is where it’s at though, and while I don’t think he was the best ever, and all that nonsense, Mayweather holds that edge by a landslide.

I don’t think Loma has the time to catch up there.

 

So have lots of other guys who never amounted to anything in the pros. They are too different to combine. I'm not going to rank Henry Tillman ahead of Mike Tyson no matter how many times he beat him in the amateurs. Different sports. Lomo was the better AM, and Floyd was the better pro.

Lomo fans in the past touted him as the guy to surpass Floyd *in the pros*. That obviously didn't work out, so now they are trying to bootstrap his amateur career into the equation. It's silly.

 

It is not silly to tell that for masculinity proof pro boxing is piece of **** and total garbage.
Pro belts are boring. Mayweather and Canelo are nobodies to entertain kids in cubicles.
Pro belts are stuff to sell for someone to watch this greatness.

For end: I'm not Loma fan, I just laugh about western fan kids posts in forums.
I laugh about western kids here a lot.

Western kids in cubicles to sell them pro boxe as symbol of their national, ethnic and origin pride with nice belts.
Watch and pay and be proud and smart customer for business.

 

For sure: to get hometown cards, all this shitty clauses and hometown fighters.
Who is best tickets seller and from more large country etc.

Most laughable stuff is to sell boxing as stuff not like sport but proof of manhood.
Without old era clinches, without elbows and kicks............. Pro boxe is ***** art if compare even with MT. ***** kings sport for murcians.

 

EVERYONE is a nobody to certain kids in a cubicle. Just as you're a nobody to every poster there. You just like to act like you are superior to 'western' posters and act all high and mighty, while saying basically nothing of value.

Hell, you claim to NOT be a loma fan simply because he moved up in weight. What kind of fake fan does that?

 

This board is about pro boxing. You don't like it, eff off or something. You'll never provide a post worth recognizing w/ value. You just come to troll American posters and act like you are better.

 

Yes?

 

Ah yes, because amateur boxing is clean as a whistle. Never been any match fixing scandals, for example.

https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/ot...nst-aiba-from-rio-olympics-1.3840273?mode=amp

https://www.newyorker.com/sports/sporting-scene/fixing-the-olympics-azerbaijans-boxing-scandal