Lomachenko punished for mockery of boxing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by 6'4south, Mar 3, 2014.


  1. Boxing Truth

    Boxing Truth Active Member banned Full Member

    1,336
    144
    Dec 13, 2013
    That's exactly what happened.

    It was a conspiracy against Lomanchenko for him fighting for a world title, just after his pro debut.

    These professional members (Salido, Judges, Referee) were all basically telling Lomanchenko that:
    "You think you're a Hot Shot in your world- the Amateurs, for being an Olympic Gold Medalist, etc. and now getting a World Title shot in your 2nd pro fight..,...Well now you're coming into our world (professional boxing) and you shouldn't bend the rules and fight for a world title after winning your pro debut against a nobody,,,,,,so were gonna mess with you and you cant do much about it cause you have very little leverage as a 1 pro fight Boxer "
     
  2. robert80

    robert80 Boxing Addict banned

    5,189
    2
    Oct 13, 2013
    He will not improve from here on in. HE has a lot of mileage on that body with 400 contests!
     
  3. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    that wasn't his 2nd pro fight...it was his 8th. he was paid $5k a fight for his six bouts under the wsb. they fought under pro rules.

    cole is a piece of ****. it's no secret. i don't get why bob arum would roll the dice in texas with his potential star. hindsight is 20/20.

    lomachenko still has a bright future. i just hope he doesn't pull a felix sturm and never return to the u.s.
     
  4. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    It's weird, but OK since he got away with doing it once. But, there is no way he should be allowed to fight for the vacant belt a second time right after his loss where he danced with Saildo while having his balls repeated tickled.
     
  5. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    it was a split decision loss. the kid belongs. without the favorable ref...we would be discussing lomachenkos win right now.
     
  6. 6'4south

    6'4south Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,943
    81
    Apr 2, 2012
    @Boxing Truth

    I honestly believe that a conspiracy in this case does exist, and I'm really not one who believes in most of them, but I can't understand how Salido could get away with so many blatant fouls and not even be WARNED once. Unfortunately this won't be the last black eye for our sport.
     
  7. eltirado

    eltirado Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,706
    1,690
    Jul 31, 2013
    Salido is the real Champion...who would have been the polar opposite of Lomachenko, so this could have been possible

    If Lomachenko was as GODly as many of us felt (including casinos), he should have been able to KO Salido as many boxers did...fair game

    Loma can try again, Pro Boxing is rough...nothing wrong with losing
     
  8. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    Can't blame **** on the ref.
    So the ref didn't call all those low blows. Big ****.

    The ref also didn't call Loma for acting like he was on Dancing With The Stars.
    Had Loma not hugged Saildo all night, kept his ditance and punched, he would have won the fight. He didn't and he lost.
    No second chance for losers.

    Give the veterans their props and match-up two worthy contenders for the vacant belt. :yep
     
  9. eltirado

    eltirado Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,706
    1,690
    Jul 31, 2013
    Salido lost 12 times, 5 times by KO. It was a real test, not a conspiracy :nono
     
  10. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    learn the difference between holding and smothering then come back and talk to me.

    sweetsciguru??? lmao. gtfoh.
     
  11. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,126
    13,376
    Dec 2, 2012
    What a hypocritical ****:patsch:lol:
     
  12. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    LOL, Loma "Held/Smoothered" 2 minutes of each round. That's why he lost the fight. :yep

    In spite of this excessive HOLDING by Loma, all Pro-Loma fans do is attack the ref (he is bad) for not calling Saildo's low blows.
    In my mind they both should have been penalized, one for holding and the other for low blows. Since the ref didn't penalize either, the fouls of both cancel one another out. :yep
     
  13. TheGreenlad

    TheGreenlad Guest

    Surely they can't do that, that would be a disgrace, it's the silver spoon treatment to the maximum, he should have to work his way back up! THis will **** a hell of a lot of fighters off, who when they get a shot may never get one again,

    his talent didnt match his hype like i was saying
     
  14. TheGreenlad

    TheGreenlad Guest

    Can someone confirm if hes fighting for a world title in his next fight again, that is not right at all!
     
  15. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    ask yourself this....

    what choice did lomachenko have if the ref wasn't going to call the excessive low blows? he had to smother to take those punches away.

    had the ref called them appropriately, it would have opened up the fight for lomachenko. salido couldn't hit him anywhere else. that fight was pathetic on salidos part. the only thing more pathetic is all the mexican fans celebrating it like it was a legit win. like salido did something special.