Lomachenko vs Bradley

They are separated by 5 divisions.

Bradley, obviously, by complete wipeout.

 

atschatsch Bradley by being the much bigger man.

 

bradley would beat his ass proper..

 

Who is the more gifted fighter, irrespective of size? Lomachenko and it isn't all that close.

Who would win? Bradley. Too big (walks around at a ripped 170), too strong.

 

They both weighed in under 147 and above 140 in that fight, so horrible example.

Lomachenko has never weighed in above 122 and Bradley has never weighed in below 139-ish and has now competed at 147 for the last couple years.

Lomachenko couldn't handle Salido physically, how in the world could he have any success against Timothy Bradley?? That's just stupid talk.

 

5 divisions, guys. 5.

 

You're acting like Bradley is some kind of pitiful flailing novice and is hardly capable of putting one foot in front of the other.

Bradley (while not an ATG) is a very good, very solid fighter. One of the top men at 147 and had a great run at 140. Tim has been in with great comp and has seen the 'fast southpaw' thing before.

oh yeah AND HE'S HUGE COMPARED TO LOMA. That old expression about "a good big man beats a good small man" would hold true in this case.

 

Lomachenko would school him. If Bradley could punch a bit it would be different, but Lomachenko is levels higher in terms of skills and I would guess that he is actually physically stronger than Bradley is. Lomachenko does one handed pull ups, walks around on his hands etc. Bradley is a pitiful athlete, he doesn't move well and is slow. Seeing Bradley try and sprint around a track was pitiful. The guy just isn't an elite athlete.

 

You have no idea what you're talking about, Lomachenko has never fought at 122. He fights at 126 and comes in at 135-140, and he fought at 135 in the amateurs.

 

Horrible comparison between Oscar De La Zombie and in his prime Bradley.

 

Bradley would knock Lomachenko the **** out. The fact that you brought up height means you don't know **** about boxing. :rofl

If Lomachenko could compete at 147, then he'd be a 147 fighter because that's where the money is. But he doesn't, because he ISN'T a 147 fighter, he's a 126 lb featherweight, END OF.

Broner thought he could jump just a measly 10 lbs, and discovered he has no power and couldn't take welterweight punches that well.

And you're asking Lomachenko to jump 21 pounds? :rofl

Lomachenko would have ZERO power to gain any respect, and if you thought he had problems with Salido's punches to the body, Bradly would rip him apart (and any other legitimate 147 pounder, for that matter. Maidana would probably cave his ribcage in. :rofl )

Now get out of this delusional world of yours. :rofl

 

You must be another delusional fanboy or alt of Asssault Joker.

Doing one handed pullups and walking around on your hands doesn't mean you're physically stronger compared to someone else in a higher weight class, all that proves is you're able to move your own body weight, BIG DIFFERENCE.

And to call Bradley a pitiful athlete just proves further you don't know **** about boxing. Bradley has shown himself to be a superb athlete just by his training camp (which you obviously know nothing about) and numerous triathlons he's completed.

 

Theres much more to Bradley than his strength. He's still somewhat an underrated fighter and boxer, the only thing really missing is a ko punch. But like I said, cuz he's good at everything else, still capable of winning without it. Loma is a superb boxer/puncher, and cuz Bradley isn't a big puncher, many seem to underestimate Bradley. If Bradley wasn't so versatile or if he was a more basic fighter, then yea, Loma has what it takes to beat a much larger fighter, just not an elite like Bradley.