Lomachenko vs Miguel Cotto at 140

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dance84, Jul 8, 2018.


Who would of win

  1. Loma ud

  2. Loma ko

  3. Cotto ud

  4. Cotto ko

  5. Draw

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. LitoCandela

    LitoCandela Active Member Full Member

    777
    418
    Jul 31, 2017
    The hate is real.
    Cotto was wrecking sh!t at 140. His prime. He won his first belt at 140. Probably defended his belt by ko every fight.

    Loma wouldn't last 12 rounds.
     
  2. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    we simply dont know how Nomas does at 140, but its safe to assume he would be competitive based on his exploits at LW from which he could carry up at least some of his elite abilities such as work rate and skills.
     
  3. willcross

    willcross Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,372
    672
    Jun 11, 2006

    Pretty sure Torres did drop cotto. Been a long time since I’ve seen it tho
     
  4. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    I think you're right. I guess I meant more often if he was chinny.
     
  5. LitoCandela

    LitoCandela Active Member Full Member

    777
    418
    Jul 31, 2017

    Each guy got dropped about twice I think.
     
    pistal47 and LANCE99 like this.
  6. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    I think you're right. No shame there, Ricardo Torres was a bomber.
     
    LitoCandela likes this.
  7. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,240
    Oct 7, 2006
    I'm going with Loma by decision. I don' see Cotto catching Loma with much.