Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux - The SIZE/WEIGHT. The REAL Fight of The Century.

What about in his third fight? Not really impressive?

 

If you like paper titles, I guess. And if you don't mind that he only had to fight another unproven kid ranked 20th or something in the division instead of a proven champion. Sure, it's alright.

It's not like it's a competition or anything. So what if Lomachenko loses every two or three fights and Julio Cesar Chavez Jr goes 46-0. Does that mean that Julio Cesar Chavez Jr is 23 times as good as Lomachenko just because he lost in his second fight? There's lots of ways to impress people. Some fighters impress people by not losing, and then there are others.

 

Nicely put.

Anyone who puts more weight on the record, rather than the actual fights, DKSAB politics.

Mayweather LOST TO CASTILLO. PERIOD.
HE DID NOT ADAPT. HE WAS LOST FOR LONG STRETCHES OF RDS, AND ANYONE WHO THINKS MAYWEATHER WON 5 rds in that fight is a dikkrider.

Same goes for the Lomachenko Salido fight.
A non partisan fan sees it as a NC or DQ W for Lomachenko.
And I believe while BOXREC will record it as SD 12, history of ppl who ksab, will undoubtedly find it different.
Just like CASTILLO Mayweather 1.

To his credit Mayweather won 2, all on his own.

 

"It's alright", nobody's done this but him. You can spin this any way you want to lol, Russell was a legitimate opponent and he's proven that.

 

Apart from one guy^

 

Ovid***ile and Nonito Smoak are the same obtuse kunt.


EDIT;

Just read some posts on a GGG thread, I may have been wrong.