Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux who wins

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Fighting Fungus, Jul 11, 2014.


  1. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,339
    7,910
    Sep 2, 2011
    Yeah, I pick Rigo also for that reason. The biggest question mark is how Rigo would deal with Loma's size advantage.
     
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,178
    Jun 23, 2005
    If Rigo could fight on the inside I would pick him but he can't. I think Loma can be had there. Loma is bigger than Rigo and I would probably lean towards Loma.
     
  3. Meffus

    Meffus Guest

    Loma is very good. He has great technique and ability, I really like his patience and how he is able to keep a cool head (a lot of people see this as a negative) and this guy is really good to watch. But Loma seems like a very well rehearsed and drilled fighter where as Rigondeaux just does things that you shouldn't be able to do. When I watch Loma I think, that's good boxing great straight punches, footwork and keeping your hands up coming up, that's what you're taught and you're pulling it off perfectly. When I watch Rigondeaux I think, how the bloody hell is this guy even doing this?
     
  4. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,931
    2,692
    Apr 17, 2009
    Yes, on video Rigo looks the better of the two but Loma's amateur record was better and has pushed himself more in his early pro career.
     
  5. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    Perfectly stated.
    Rigo isnt calling him out.
    There are plenty of fish in the 122-130 sea for them to split, and Loma can hone his craft for 2-3 yrs Koing the Dibs and Agbekos before he and Rigo get it on.

    It's almost an inevitable TR matchup......just not one needs to be made with a 13-0 vs a 2-1 guy. Give em both a couple yrs to build reputation.:thumbsup
     
  6. Boxmaster

    Boxmaster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,231
    11
    Aug 15, 2009
    Rigo has perhaps the best amateur record in history. But I would say they are competitive on the amateur level. It's the pro level where Rigondeux is light years ahead and undefeated.

    No one has come close to beating Rigondeux while Lomachenko has already lost and hasn't really beaten anyone of note in his career.
     
  7. Boxmaster

    Boxmaster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,231
    11
    Aug 15, 2009
    Rigondeux won 2 gold medals and faced better competition in the amateurs as well as in the pros.
     
  8. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    The sooner this fight happens, the better for Rigo. Loma's already dangerous. A more experienced version, along with that size advantage, would be a very tall task- even for a supremely skilled operator like Rigo.

    I rate Rigo's H2H skills very highly, but his style isn't built to score well on a larger pure boxer who doesn't expose himself by making many technical mistakes and who has great defense. Rigo would have to go out of his comfort zone and press the action- be the aggressor- to win. Maybe he's good enough to pull it off, but I think it's a step too far if he doesn't go for it before Lomachenko completely adjusts to the pro game.
     
  9. Todd498

    Todd498 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,817
    19,075
    Jun 13, 2011
    :facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:


    You idiots:pipi