Lomachenko vs Russell jr. purse bid on April 18th

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by dealt_with, Apr 16, 2014.


  1. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    At what point was GRJ facing ascending talent? GRJ only has experience against one style - bum. Lomachenko has vast experience against the best from around the world.
     
  2. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    Loma has two Pro fights.
    The first although a former champion had the same style as GRJ's opponents.
    The second, an over weight champion beat Loma. :yep

    GRJ is going to deflate the bubble surrounding Loma and his amateur experience.
     
  3. Sweet-D-Willy

    Sweet-D-Willy Tha Realest Full Member

    8,474
    4
    Jan 23, 2013
    he certainly doesn't deserve a second title opportunity, but oh well..

    1-2 as a pro it is.. :yep
     
  4. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    But he deserves it because he almost beat Saildo.

    He would have beat him too if Saildo hadn't used all those dam professional tricks on Loma.
     
  5. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    You didn't answer the question... when did GRJ face ascending talent? His last opponent, Tomayo, had lost 3 of his last 5 fights by knockout within 4 rounds, and at a lighter weight than he was against GRJ. A blown up flyweight 15-7 (5 KO losses) before he fought GRJ. Compare that to who Lomachenko fought in his debut (25-3, just beat Bautista, never stopped before). So that's it, Tomayo is who GRJ fought before his title shot... and people think Lomachenko is the undeserving one in this fight? :patsch
     
  6. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    :lol:
    See what happens and make sure you stick around afterwards (if GRJ has the balls to take the fight that is).
     
  7. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,988
    19,911
    Nov 27, 2010
    Russell is fraud. A coward and Loma will kick the sh!t out of him if they fight. But, I can see and fully expect Russell to run from a guy with 2 pro fights...LMAO
     
  8. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    I know your name :yep, and I want that 500 VCash. :good
     
  9. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    That's great, I have no idea who you are. Can we bet Vcash one on one?
     
  10. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    I meant Dealt_with, fool. :rofl

    Good question on one on one Vcash though. Somebody step up on this? Can I take this fools vcash? :huh
     
  11. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Yeah.. my name is dealt_with :huh
    On the left underneath the time you can read what a posters name is, now you're going to go far in life.
     
  12. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    If we can't bet Vcash, there is always virtualcash.
     
  13. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,105
    4,100
    Jul 19, 2004
    Russell will demand Laurence Cole as his referee, not to mention the judges. Lomachenko should know how dirty boxing is in the pros............hell, the judges counted punches on the legs, hips, balls, behind the head, elbows, as legit punches. Salido was out on his feet in the last round.............

    Salido did not win the fight, Laurence Cole won the fight................
     
  14. ivanthegreat

    ivanthegreat Member Full Member

    362
    0
    Mar 14, 2013
    russels next fight is against tba...he aint fighting loma
     
  15. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,084
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    My response I've quoted above that seemed to get responses was directly a very exaggerated response to this statement: