Lomenchenko vs the Featherweight Fab 4

at this point, i would still favor the fab 4, but vasyl is just starting to make his mark. im sure he would be competitive even in a loss.

 

Give him another 5 fights and he can take any of those versions.

 

He's not getting beaten in a boxing match by anybody. Marquez would give him some issues with his counter punching and intelligence, Barrera and Morales would get out boxed and Lomachenko would shatter Pac's glass body.

 

Lomachenko is the best and will keep on winning. It's a shame he was cheated by the Salido criminals. Rematch coming up?

 

When he moves to 130, from what I understand he wants to unify 126 first, and I'm guessing the Rigo match. So the rematch might have to wait a while, not that I think it's necessary. Any objective viewer knows what that was, even if you had Lomachenko losing you know it wasn't because of any good work by Salido.

 

Part of me thinks that MAB gets him.

 

At the moment, I pick all of them to beat Lomachenko.

How can you pick a guy who struggled with Salido and whose only relevant wins are wide decisions over Gary Russell Jr. and Piriyapino (if you want to clutch to as much as possible)?

I know styles make fights, but holy sh!t, beat somebody who has ever beaten a top 10 fighter before I start picking you to have a chance against contemporary-era-legends.

 

Pac would be too fast and too unorthodox for him, he is the only one i am confident would bet Lomachenko.

 

Exactly this.

 

I'm sure it got deleted,,... When I was submitting my reply,, the site said Invalid Thread,,... Why it got deleted??? That, I don't know,,...
Moving on,,... I see Lomachenko-Hamed as a 50-50 fight,, having said that,,... Barrera beat Hamed,, Morales, Pacquioa and Marquez beat Barrera,,... THough you could make a strong case about Barrera winning over Marquez,,...And if John can beat Marquez,, I'm sure Lomachenko could also win,,... Lomachenko is 10 times better than John in my opinion,,...

 

both attributes are shared by naz, how do you see a fit and motivated version of naz doing?

 

I feel that Pac will be too dynamic for him. Pac used to throw lots of punches and Loma is somewhat economical for the moment. Pac should out work him and bust him up in a competitive fight. Loma would give too much angles to Morales and I think that he can outbox and out-fox him. Barrera fight seems a toss up. Hamed gets confused and outboxed.

 

I can't say that I would bet for Vasyl in Loma-Pacman fight, but it would definetely be competative. I agree that Pacquiao throwing lots of punches would be a sort of problem for any fight but anyone is vulnerable when he throws a shot.

First of all, Lomachenko has higher boxing IQ and together with his trainer would study the flaws of Pacman. Like Marquez did. They would work on some patterns, combinations, and Pacquiao would get those punches. Moreover, Lomachenko is more defensively responsible, he would make Pacquiao beat the air and would simply deliver shots of his own. If Lomachenko stays economical, the judges may give rounds to Pacquiao.

 

No way in hell Pac who misses half of his punches on punching bags like Algieri could beat Loma. Not happening.