Long count BS debunked again

I won't come down to your level. I just feel pity for your parents. People usually stretch to insults, when they run out of arguments.
Next time read better, if you can, but seeing your comment, you obviously can't.

 

Read the stuff online and watch back the fight
Long count happened cos wilder was NOT in the neutral corner

 

I don't need to read the rules. The count was long, and every commentators acknowledge it. There is a thing slow and fast count in boxing, and maybe you should read about it.
I never complain about that i just mention it. But people on here are so biased, can't even look with their own eyes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_count

Again the count could be 20 seconds and all to be fair and square. I never said Fury should have been counted out or so. I say referee was fair to both, but the count was long, as it was.
Never ever i stated anything different or that Wilder should have won or anything similar to it. And yeah obviously a count in boxing is not equal to 10 seconds.
And there is usually a guy ringside that starts the count and the ref picks it up from him, right

Again there is nothing to do this i just mention it. Some referee may have faster count, some slower, as we see. As well as giving more time to both fighter to recover, as it was the case, but the case WAS TO BOTH FIGHTER, as i already mention like 100 times.