Probably some kind of one strap defence holder of a lesser title or belt. I can't really see picking Wlad which has come up a few times who had his flaws but was still more proven than many champions.
And yet, one of them (Wlad) engenders polite rebuke, while the other (Wilder) gets regularly caned. I suppose there's good reason for that, too. Wilder doesn't pop up on my radar for this automatically because, in terms of Championship Level, he could be perceived as an Also-Ran. That said – yeah – I barely remember most of his run.
Except he beat Luis Ortiz twice and Tyson Fury required two matches to beat him and hit the deck more times against Wilder than he had fights with him.
Povetkin would’ve been bombed out. He’s better off with the failed drug tests and fanboys romancing over “could have been” scenarios.
You’re lucky he didn’t shoulder block you, tie up your hands, head butt you and throw in a forearm shiv. I love watching Rosi fight. Supreme spoiler style. So fog chew to you and Joe mudder too, pal!
I'll add Evander Holyfield, I think he has a really tarnished legacy, used to love the guy, heart of a lion, tough as nails and fan friendly style. But fought on way too long, had like 10 kids out of wedlock, and the steroids and other performance enhancing drugs.
Dip**** he was champ at Cruiserweight 1986-1988, then twice reigned at heavyweight 90-92, then again from 97-99.
First off, you need to calm yourself down. Second of all, Holyfield's longest title reign was five defenses, hardly a long reigning champ. I'd like an apology.