Long time Wladimir Fan But..

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MaliBua, Oct 6, 2013.


  1. MAJR

    MAJR Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,534
    407
    Jul 16, 2012
    Sorry? Luis Pabon goes out of his way to stop clinches in Povetkin/Huck - indeed, to break them up without cause or reason - then does sod all to stop clinches in Povetkin/Klitschko and it's somehow a response to how Povetkin fought Huck. Am I missing something?
     
  2. elbonzoseco

    elbonzoseco Member Full Member

    495
    465
    Nov 13, 2010
    ..apparently. He warned Wlad about the pushing/elbows, Povetkin just came in low. When even Huck, who's shorter than Sasha, starts to lean on him, there must be something to it, don't you think?
     
  3. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Exactly :good
     
  4. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Alll this talk of a povetkin coming in low, but no evidence.

    I'm not sure that people understand that to illegally 'come in low' you actually have to have your head ducked BELOW your opponent's waist. Ducking under or inside your opponents punches and coming in crouched down is perfectly legal and is not a justifiable reason your opponent to be able to grab you, pull down and lean on you repeatedly without warning or point deductions.

    So, if you could show me some actual evidence of Povetkin coming forward with his head at such a height that his head was actually below Wlad's waist line then I'd really appreciate it.

    Thanks
     
  5. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    -Your not equating a clinch with a low blow, than you do just that for an entire paragraph.

    -Look, you don't have a duty to be unbiased, you aren't a reporter. Just pointing out that any debate with you is an utter waste of time for me and will only go in circles...complete with insults you are already freely dishing out, and I just don't have the time for that these days.

    -Go find someone else to waste their time on your insults.
     
  6. SpikeJab

    SpikeJab Member Full Member

    151
    0
    Aug 23, 2013
    Wlad has a fan? When did that happen?
     
  7. elbonzoseco

    elbonzoseco Member Full Member

    495
    465
    Nov 13, 2010
    I'm not saying what Sasha did was a foul, I'm just stating they're both to blame of how the fight turned out. Sasha ducked his head, made a step and wanted to throw the overhand right. He hoped Wlad would step back when he came in, so he could catch him on the way out.
    Wlad stepped in whenever Sasha tried this, so they ended up in a clinch. There's only so much you can do about it, though I thought the leaning was too much. Wlad couldn't step back, thats what Sasha wanted him to do. He did halt him with the jab as well, if he'd sidestep everytime, he'd be dizzy by the 3rd round. :)
    Both should have changed their approach, anyway, off to work..
     
  8. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    And that's pretty much everything that needs to be said on the matter, bravo.

    :yep
     
  9. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    No.

    A clinch is a clinch.

    Grabbing behind the head, pulling them down so that he is bent over and then applying all your body weight to their neck and shoulders is not a clinch.

    That's three different illegal manoeuvres.
     
  10. G Man

    G Man Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,003
    1,012
    Jun 25, 2011
    1.34 Proves the holding was just as much Povetkin's fault as Wlad's in their fight.
     
  11. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,036
    27,681
    Jul 26, 2004
    That's only partly true.

    There were many times when the clinching was Povetkins fault. And him being held and grabbed was a bit Karma imo for what he pulled in the Huck fight.

    But make no mistake, there were many many many times where Wlad simply held, or lunged in to hold, when it wasn't at all necessary, and where the educated eye (for example, chris byrd) saw where there should have been a step back and a punch, or a turn and a punch, or a stationary uppercut, instead of a grab and hold.


    You mix in the reasonable clinches (which there were), and the unreasonable clinches, and it made for one of the worst championship fights in recent history.
     
  12. G Man

    G Man Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,003
    1,012
    Jun 25, 2011
    So when Povetkin initiates a clinch it's reasonable, but when Wlad does it it's unreasonable?

    Either way it was a clash of styles that caused all the holding, not strictly just Wlad's fault.
     
  13. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,036
    27,681
    Jul 26, 2004
    Um... yes.


    When Povetkin leans forward, or even effectively gets inside and gets held, that is reasonable of wlad to hold. (even that's debatable, but for this discussion lets say its reasonable)

    It is not reasonable to throw a punch then jump in to smother your opponent. Or to simply jump forward and hold him out of nowhere. Both which happened frequently in the fight.

    So.... ya.

    Like it or not, there is reasonable and unreasonable holding in boxing.


    Hence the almost universal outcry pouring on his performance this weekend.

    And no, its not just a case of styles.

    The styles would have caused for a bad fight due to holding, no doubt.

    That Wlad grabbed, held and leaned to excess on top of that bad styles matchup, made it not just a bad fight, but a horrible fight and one of the worst heavyweight title fights in recent memory.

    Of course its not just on Wlad. But to try and deflect that he shares most of the blame is being willfully ignorant.
     
  14. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    Isn't that how Mike Tyson used to fight? Throw left hook, miss, clinch. Jump in, try an uppercut, clinch.
     
  15. G Man

    G Man Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,003
    1,012
    Jun 25, 2011
    Povetkin came in with his head every time, putting his head in Wlad's groin area, so of course a clinch was inevitable.

    He did this because he knew that if he didn't he would get caught by Wlad's jab on the way in.

    I'm sorry but that is what happened repeatedly throughout the fight, Povetkin came in in such a way that holding was inevitable, then when Wlad inevitably holds it looks like it's all his fault.

    If Wlad looked to be initiating the clinch at times as Povetkin came in it is probably due to the fact he knows what is about to happen due to it having happened before.

    The bottom line is when someone barges towards you flailing their arms around with their head at groin level you have little option but to end up in a clinch. If they keep doing it then eventually you will just anticipate a clinch and go with it as you have no other choice.

    Wlad held a lot, but Povetkin was to blame for initiating his share of it.

    Like I said, a clash of styles.