I abhor boxings approach to safety first and protecting the zero. The gambles are much more interesting for me.
Yeah this one is crazy. He could've had a few more great nights against fellow brawlers in sold out arenas. Fighting Floyd back then didn't even pay well.
Jeff Lacy vs Joe Calzaghe was wonderfully terrible matchmaking of the part of Lacy's team This content is protected
This seem more like a cash out of a guy they didn't believe had the talent to accomplish much. They were right, by the way. Lacy had had a few fights in the UK prior to this, so his management must have had some connection. The Italian Dragon was 40-0 fighting a 20-0 prospect, not sure how this fight was ever made up to be a great win except UK fans huffing the fumes of a few US promoters selling a guy they didn't have any faith in.
What reason would they have for giving up on Lacy? He’d just won three title defences by stoppage, had battered Robin Reid (who Calzaghe narrowly beat a while back and had only lost that disgraceful fight against Ottke in the past five years beforehand)? Sounds like he was going along alright, but I won’t pretend to be old enough to have known the prevailing opinion about Lacy at that time. All I do know is that practically every (albeit US) reporter picked Lacy to win (and in many cases decimate) Calzaghe pre-fight.
Completely disagree with this. Both teams rated their boxers chances very highly before this fight. Lacy had just been on the front cover of Sports Illustrated a couple months before, they had grand plans for him.
Joyce vs zhang 2 The first fight was obviously a risk for joyce as he closed in on a title shot. The second fight was blatant career suicide.
ROY JONES JR Lacy wins, and I'll tell you why. One of the main factors that would lead to a Lacy win is Calzaghe's heart. I'm not saying Calzaghe dosen't have heart, I'm saying he has too much! When Lacy nails Calzaghe and hurts him then Joe will try to get payback, and then he will be open to really get hurt - which he will. JAMES TONEY Joe Calzaghe-Jeff Lacy is a mismatch. Lacy is going to destroy that boy. He's too strong, he's a fighter - he's proved himself. Calzaghe never did anything. He beat Chris Eubank nine years ago, but what has he done since then? He's a joke, that's why he keeps pulling out of fights. I wouldn't be surprised if he pulled out of this one. Everybody in the UK is over-protected, but Lacy will be OK, because he's a fighter. NIGEL BENN I remember seeing Lacy a while back on Joe's undercard and I wasn't impressed, wasn't impressed. But he seems to of really knuckled down and improved since then. I saw him fight Robin Reid and I was impressed, he looked good and he'll give Joe some stick. I reckon both guys will take abit of stick. Lacy seems to like to maraud forward and Joe has always thrown a lot of leather. I reckon they'll both take some stick but you have to go with Joe, he has that killer instinct and fast punches to get the job done but he'll take some stick man, take some stick. ROBIN REID Make no mistake about it - three, five, eight or 10 years ago and Calzaghe would of overcome a Jeff Lacy. I really think Calzaghe of years gone by was too strong, too fast and too flashy for Jeff. But I'm definately predicting a Lacy win now. Calzaghe's chin is not as strong as it once was due to wars against Eubank, Sheika, Brewer, Mitchell, Salem and so on. Also, the main factor is that Joe's left hand is very prone to injury and he'll need to hit Jeff as hard as he can to keep him off him. I think Calzaghe may injure his hand during the fight and get ruthlessly stopped in the mid-rounds by Jeff Lacy. Fight over. MIKKEL KESSLER I predict it will be an excellent match but if the fight goes past six rounds Joe Calzaghe will be victorious. Whilst Lacy has obvious power I think Joe has too much experience and too much boxing ability for him. If Calzaghe stays away from the obvious power of Lacy early on he will come out victorious. RICHIE WOODHALL My money's on Joe but I would have preferred this fight to have come five years sooner. Joe's on home soil and, although it's great when the crowd's behind you, they can spur you on and force you into boxing the wrong style. If he stands and fights with Lacy, Joe will come unstuck because Lacy's got a lot of power and is the best short-range fighter in the division. But Joe will show intelligence and keep it mid-to-long range. I think he'll box cleverly on the back foot and win on points. CARL FROCH I think Calzaghe's left it a couple of years too late. Two years ago he would have beaten Lacy on points. But he doesn't look as sharp and tough as he used to, and I think Lacy will get him out of there within the distance. The last few fights Calzaghe's hit the deck a couple of times and that shows a bit of vulnerability. I've got a feeling Calzaghe will make the mistake of being drawn into a fight, because he's a proud man. He'll come unstuck, because Lacy is a big puncher. STEVE BUNCE Calzaghe will win it. Lacy hasn't beaten anybody who's been anywhere near their best. He's the American idol but he's really not that special. Hopefully Joe has enough left and has not left it too late for the big fight. CLINTON WOODS Calzaghe may have a few sticky moments early on if Lacy comes out banging but Joe is strong enough to deal with it. I can then see him winning it late on and stopping Lacy, maybe in the eighth or ninth round. I hope he does it, it's great for us British fighters to show the Amercians what we can do. FRANK MALONEY It will be a tough fight for Joe and I can see it being very close. It could go to points but I think having that crowd behind him in Manchester will play a big factor and give him the edge. FREDDIE ROACH Lacy is too strong for Calzaghe. It will not go the distance. I see Lacy ending it in the later rounds, possibly by the 10th. JEFF FENECH I don't see how Calzaghe can keep Lacy off of him. I wouldn't be surprised by a knockout, but I think it will probably be by a dominant unanimous decision. Glenn Catley, who Calzaghe beat in the 1992 ABA final, is going for a Lacy win. Chris Sanigar, who's fighters Joe beat in successive ABA finals (Catley in 92 and Darren Dorrington in 1993), predicts that Calzaghe will win. John Garfield ESB's greatest poster RIP Originally Posted by John Garfield
A 1-1 Loma fighting a 24-0 GRJ in the later's country with a home ref and three home judges, one of whom robbed Loma in a fight he completely dominated and won at absolute worst 9-3 or 10-2, the second time he'd been robbed in just his third fight in the US and it wouldn't be his last time either after one of the three US judges inexplicably scored the the Teofimo fight 119-109 despite Loma clearly sweeping the vast majority of the rounds in the second half of the fight and obviously all three judges robbed him against Haney, was crazy risky. Had Loma lost he would've been 1-2 in his first 3 fights and his career in absolute tatters. That was an insanely ballsy risk for Loma to take.
Benn and McClellan seems an obvious one. Two guys who were tough as nails, could bang and didn't know when to quit... A recipe for someone sustaining either a particularly brutal KO loss or a seriously punishing accumulation beating. As much as we all like a war, sometimes (especially back then) it's possible for it to go way too far... And even if nobody would've predicted it would end quite that badly, the ingredients were always there.
Tyson vs Mcbride The guy was huge and brought zero ppv dollars to the table. An unnecessarily hard night's work for Tyson.