McCall way too high. Buster Douglas was an undisputed and linear HW champion, McCall never was. And don't forget that Douglas beat McCall. McCall's best wins: Lewis, Seldon, Akinwande, Damiani (well, he hardly beat 45-years old Holmes. Also he KO'd Maskaev - it was Oleg's 7th pro fight) Douglas: Tyson, McCall :good, Berbick, Page (also James beat Cobb and Mike Williams) I think Douglas must rank higher on your list than McCall
About Nova, he was very respected in his own day. I remember reading that Ray Arcel thought he had an excellent chance of beating Joe Louis, but Nova seemed to freeze in the fight. Nova was only a 13-5 underdog against Louis, tying Walcott in his SECOND fight with Louis as the shortest odds against Louis except for Schmeling as a 9-5 dog in 1938. The two stoppages of Max Baer are strong marquee wins. That loss to Galento pulls Nova down a bit, but Galento seems to have been allowed by the ref to throw away the rule book.
Interesting debate and I'll cut to the chase; Sanders Briggs Thompson Satterfield Baker Murray do not belong.
Sorry Matt but you've made your contribution. Obviously i appreciate the feedback and discussion, but i can't keep making adjustments from one person, or the list would go from one personal list to another, instead of a consensus list.
Joe Bugner would have beaten Bonavena and Chuvalo handily, and he would have beaten many of the other men on your list, too. I say Bugner should be rated no less than 70th to 80th of all time. Why have you left the Klitschkos out?
Okay, i've included Bugner again, but wouldn't you say top70 is a bit high? The list goes on accomplishment, not potential (i.e. he would've beaten Bonavena and Chuvalo). His best wins are an old Ellis, Mac Foster who lost to every decent fighter at that point and Cooper who wasn't all that to begin with. In addition to that, various other posters had him no higher than top90 if i remember correct. Which fighter would you like to have removed from the list? Here is the top90 and 100: 81-89 Lou Nova Luis Firpo Shannon Briggs Paulino Uzcudun Billy Miske Ernie Shavers Bob Satterfield Mike Weaver George Chuvalo Tommy Farr 90-99 Denver Ed Martin Leroy Haynes Nino Valdes Greg Page Tommy Burns Jimmy Braddock Joe Choynski Gunboat Smith Lee Savold Larry Donald Read the rules on the first page. I'm only counting fighters active between 1900 and 1999, although i do take accomplishments outside of that into account if one spends a good amount of time between former mentioned limits. I didn't include currently active boxers, either (not counting officially active but not going to achieve anything anymore, like Holyfield and Tua).
Top 70 may be a bit high for Bugner, now that I think about it. But I still think he belongs in the all-time top 100. I believe that the good, big guys of the '70s onward would tend to beat the good, smallish guys of the middle and early 20th century (not always, but often enough). As for ratings philosophy, I guess you and I think differently. I rank guys on an all-time basis based on how good they were. In other words, I rate them on the basis of who-beats-who in the ring. As for who I would like to see removed from your list, that's asking too much. A lot of these guys -- especially the ones dating from the early 20th century -- I simply haven't seen enough film footage to know how they deserve to rate on an all-time basis. In many cases, adequate film footage doesn't exist, or not enough of it exists.
Still hadvnt answered me pontius how could bob satterfield and bob baker possibly be rated above clarence henry? how could bob baker possibly be rated 35 spots over clarence henry?
I know I'm not supposed to say any more but I just noticed NO BILLY CONN but we got Pastor and Savold...
Bugner way too high in Top 70, he's lucky to make the Top Ton itself. Is Henry Cooper in there? He certainly should be above Bugner
Chris, i don't think Dokes quality of wins is good enough to be ranked where he is/higher than certain others. Tho they have some shitty losses, i think Weaver and Page have a better quality of wins. His best win, his only top shelf win, was a very tainted KO of Weaver who came back and edged him in the rematch according to the majority of experts. Cooney is another i might rank differently. His best ever win/wins, devastating fashion or not, are quite thin. Let me know what you think.
Loewe: I've moved Quarry down to promote Baer as you had them, and Ruiz up for Ibeabuchi, Hart up to demote Dokes, Braddock up and Firpo down. Big Ukranian: I can see where you're coming from, but it should be noted that Holmes, old or not, was a legit top10 contender after beating Mercer. And Maskaev, while he had only 6 pro fights, was already very good (he beat 21-0 Miroshnichenko in his pro debut), and not only that, but McCall stopped him in the first round. A peak David Tua (top30 here), needed 11 rounds to stop him only one year later. A good win. McCall is one of those guys who learnt on the job and improved after his early losses. That said, i did move Douglas up. SuzieQ: Like i said, this list has a resolution of 10 spots, i.e. there is no such thing as being "35" spots higher than someone. It goes per ten. That aside: Satterfield (top90) in fact IS lower than Henry (top80). Baker is in the top60. I agree that Henry should rank higher than both of them, no idea why he is higher. I swapped their respective places. Kenmore: I've added Bugner (top100), at the cost of Larry Donald. Dinner: I've added Cooper (top80), i've gone over his record again and it's actually better than i remembered. Ranked in the ring top5 for three years and in the top10 for six years. JohnThomas: Dokes has more wins than just the Weaver TKO (even if it was suspicious). He beat Young in 1979 (still ranked in the top5), Cobb in 81 (ranked in the top10), and then Weaver who was #2 (with Dokes being #1). I know that Weaver is a great guy to root for and who gave Holmes one hell of a fight, but what is HIS best win? Tate? Coetzee? Those were good wins, but on the flipside: he lost an awful lot of fights, not just early but during any stage of his career, although he did improve since the Holmes fight. But i think Dokes' consistency against lesser opponents is praiseworthy, considering Weaver didn't come close to doing that. However, Weaver was ranked in the top5 for three years based on the former mentioned wins until Dokes ruined the party, and since this is a consensus list, i'll move him up to the top70. If you think he should be higher or Dokes lower, let me know and a bit more details on why. :good On Cooney: I moved him down. I'm actually surprised it took this long for someone to think he's rated too high. I thought he was. That makes the new list to: 1-10 Muhammad Ali Larry Holmes Evander Holyfield Joe Louis Joe Frazier George Foreman Lennox Lewis Mike Tyson Rocky Marciano Jack Johnson 11-20 Riddick Bowe Jack Dempsey James Jeffries Sonny Liston Harry Wills Ezzard Charles Jersey Joe Walcott Sam Langford Bob Fitzsimmons Floyd Patterson 21-30 Ingemar Johansson Max Schmeling Elmer Ray Ken Norton Oliver McCall Max Baer Jimmy Young Archie Moore Joe Jeannette David Tua 31-40 Jerry Quarry Gene Tunney Sam Mcvey Tim Witherspoon Buster Douglas Hasim Rahman Chris Byrd Pinklon Thomas Primo Carnera John Ruiz 41-50 Michael Spinks Ike Ibeabuchi Jack Sharkey Jimmy Ellis Ron Lyle Tom Sharkey Donovan Ruddock Ray Mercer Frank Bruno Eddie Machen Tommy Loughran 51-60 Michael Moorer Marvin Hart Harold Johnson Oscar Bonavena Clarence Henry Rex Layne George Godfrey Arthuro Godoy Jimmy Bivins Corrie Sanders 61-70 Tony Tucker Zora Folley Roland LaStarza Lee Murray Bob Pastor Ernie Terrel Oleg Maskaev Trevor Berbick Michael Dokes Tommy Morrison 71-80 Tony Tubbs Tami Mauriello Cleveland Williams Harry Greb Bob Baker Larry Gains Jack Renault Fred Fulton Jess Willard Turkey Thompson Henry Cooper 81-89 Lou Nova Jimmy Braddock Gerry Cooney Paulino Uzcudun Billy Miske Ernie Shavers Bob Satterfield Mike Weaver George Chuvalo Tommy Farr 90-99 Denver Ed Martin Shannon Briggs Leroy Haynes Nino Valdes Greg Page Tommy Burns Luis Firpo Joe Choynski Gunboat Smith Lee Savold Joe Bugner
Chris--I like that you put Cooper and Bugner on your list, and flipping Henry and Baker was a good idea.