Lopez: Loma is a small man, I'm a big guy

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tinman, Dec 30, 2019.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,269
    20,972
    Sep 15, 2009
    But you picked someone to win despite them not being the biggest or most physical guy.

    So you need to stop preaching about how important size is, when even you don't make picks based on size.
     
    The Underdog and dinovelvet like this.
  2. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    35,844
    28,503
    Feb 25, 2015
    I expected Loma to overcome the size differential. You have a natural 126/130 pounder going up against a natural 135/140 pounder. It's a noticeable size advantage for Lopez, but not an insurmountable size advantage.

    Lopezs combination of size, toughness, power and denying Loma his desired angles won him his fight.
     
  3. Somali Sanil

    Somali Sanil Wild Buffalo Man banned Full Member

    6,555
    7,568
    Sep 1, 2019
    So u picked Loma then mate lol. I thought Loma would win, I picked Loma too..
     
    lufcrazy likes this.
  4. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    35,844
    28,503
    Feb 25, 2015
    Only a fool deals in absolutes.
     
  5. Somali Sanil

    Somali Sanil Wild Buffalo Man banned Full Member

    6,555
    7,568
    Sep 1, 2019
    You favoured Loma, you thought he would win, there’s no problem with that, I really don’t understand the rest
     
  6. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,722
    23,030
    Jul 21, 2012
    Thats what you did in your thread the other day. . You claimed size is the single most important factor in boxing , meaning size supersedes all skill and talent.
    Size doesn't = speed , atlethiscm , skill and power. All 5 factors combined helped Lopez defeat Loma.. Size alone isn't what steered him to victory , therefore size alone is not the "single most important factor in boxing"
     
    Boxingfan2 and lufcrazy like this.
  7. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    35,844
    28,503
    Feb 25, 2015
    Size IS the most important factor in boxing. Not the only factor. Why is this difficult to comprehend?
     
  8. Somali Sanil

    Somali Sanil Wild Buffalo Man banned Full Member

    6,555
    7,568
    Sep 1, 2019
    I think your looking for the back door here mate lol
     
    CST80 likes this.
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,269
    20,972
    Sep 15, 2009
    *sith
     
  10. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,722
    23,030
    Jul 21, 2012
    There's no one factor of boxing that supersedes all others.. You don't understand this sport. That was made clear when you claimed small guys in your boxercise class were unable to hurt you , and then used that experience to argue the same theory applies to professionals.
     
    lufcrazy likes this.
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,269
    20,972
    Sep 15, 2009
    Exactly my point.

    Thanks for playing.
     
  12. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,379
    36,038
    Jul 24, 2004
    Length, not strength. Got it.
     
  13. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    35,844
    28,503
    Feb 25, 2015
    Size is the most important factor in the sport. I really cant believe you disagree with this. Why do we have weight classes then?
     
  14. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,722
    23,030
    Jul 21, 2012
    So why couldn't Smith beat Bivol?
     
  15. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    35,844
    28,503
    Feb 25, 2015
    You're taking about a very minute size differential here. Can Bivol beat Wilder?