Louis was too small to beat Wlad, yet he beat bigger men...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HENDO, Sep 20, 2010.


  1. Sakura

    Sakura Boxing Addict banned

    3,605
    7
    Nov 22, 2006
    So you do not see any other difference between them (Wladimir vs Tye)?
     
  2. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010

    Wlad is a world champion. One of the guys Tye can't beat. I'm not sure how that's what you come away from my post. Wlad being better than Tye proves nothing.
     
  3. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    Come on. how is primo even close to resembling Wlad. Louis was a great fighter. but i think the disparity in weight would be to much and talent wise they are even.
     
  4. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:patsch
     
  5. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    You are one dumb****.

    For you to even bring up the Ibragimov and Thomson fights (where Wlad won clearly and quite easily) to criticize Wlad shows you are nothing but an ignorant hater.

    And if you really think that Wlad becoming even more tentative against Joe Louis (due to Louis punchinig reputation) will work to Louis' advantage :lol: :patsch, then it is clear to me that you don't know **** about boxing. Jesus you are a ****ing moron.
     
  6. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010

    This thread is full of morons railing on about Wlad steamrolling the man who might be the greatest heavyweight of all time. Your impressed by wlad beating Tony ****ing Thompson. Your right. If Wlad could fight Louis it would be just like when he fought Thompson.
     
  7. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Vlad is way better than the big men years ago.
     
  8. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    i like louis over Wlad....Vitali is tough though n hes extremely strong..at some point i think Louis would get tired of dealing with Vitalis hard punches...

    tough pick em fight..
     
  9. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    :lol::lol::lol: Thats gotta be one of the dumbest things, Ive ever heard or seen, Yeah Wlad ti so skilled he got his ass waxed by br 3rd rate juorneymen in an out of shape 38 yr old golfer in Sanders, a limited club fighter in Purity, and an unheralded Brewster.:verysad
     
  10. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    :rofl Watch the first Brewster, Peter, and TOS fights, Wlad fought Scared and got tired and all 3 fights and ended up on his ass, He has struggled with limited 3rd rate fighters with nothing more than a decent punch, but now because he beat some more limited bums he will easily whoop Louis? GTFO wit that BS.
     
  11. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Primo = Big Bum who mafia used to fix fights because of his size

    Wlad = Son of a general, olmypic gold medalist, dominant heavyweight champion....

    Really?
     
  12. Claus Holmen

    Claus Holmen Active Member Full Member

    720
    9
    Oct 16, 2008
    Joe Louis could be outsmarted. He could not be outboxed by a giant like Wlad. Louis punched and hit with accuracy and Wlad would be an easy target.
     
  13. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    Why didn't Peter who came in at a better shape than in 2005 knock him down in the rematch? He managed to KD him thrice in 2005 so why couldn't he TOUCH (!) Wlad once let alone KD him a few weeks ago?

    There's a big, no, ASTRONOMICAL difference between Sdunek-Wlad 2003 and prime Steward-Wlad 2009/10.

    It's interesting to see haters always bringing up Puritty, Sanders & Brewster (the latter two being not that weak to begin with; your use of "bum" is inflationary) when doing phantasy match ups. If you like to talk about Wladimir Klitschko then please use the updatet Steward version who barely lost a round since 2004 und who stopped 10 out of 13 (1x TD) legit contenders.
    I'm gutted to see that such a success story of a fighter who was written off after devastating losses only to fight the most dangerous opponent around (Peter in '05) when nobody believed in him to become finally the most dominant, most avoided and most feared boxer in the world that even your mandatories rather give up their pay day than to receive punishment from him is being downplayed by haters.
     
  14. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    I'm not surprised, honestly Wlad hasn't fought many punchers since he hooked up with Steward, the few times he has though, he has frozen and been put on his ass 5 times, Wlad isn't terrible but greatest ever.....:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  15. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010

    Peter could never box to begin with. His only good work was outworking an overweight overgrown punchy James Toney. Since then he has fallen off a cliff and would be completely out of the picture if the division wasn't a steaming pile of ****. He wouldn't be able to beat any decent fighter at this point. He is basically Cliff Couser with a better record. The biggest problem keeping the bums away from Wlad is that Wlad can't and won't offer these guys the big paydays the bums used to get to get laid out by Tyson.