Love him or hate him, Wilder is holding this thing together

Oh please. Wilder succesfully defended against bad contenders and good/great fighters. He knocked them all out except for Fury.

He never went the distance in a defense with a Davarryl Wlliamson or a Rozvan Cojanu or a Trevor Berbick or a Lucien Rodriquez type. He never lost to some bloated sub like Andy Ruiz. You can't name any because if Wilder was like other alphabet titleholders, he'd have lost after a defense or three, too.

Clearly, it's too soon for you to be objective.

You're still in the LETS START A NEW THREAD BASHING WILDER BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE HAS A FIGHT LINED UP AND JOSEPH PARKER IS FIGHTING SOMEONE ON SATURDAY I'VE NEVER HEARD OF AGAIN mode.

So, go on. There are plenty of those threads to choose from.

I understand. None of your favorite heavyweights are doing anything.

So provide them ALL cover by bashing Wilder some more.

 

Whyte Wilder Whyte Wilder Whyte Wilder Whyte Wilder ....

It's comical, at this point.

Whyte's whole identity is WILDER IS DUCKING ME.

And you've lapped it up. And you've ignored Whyte's garbage performances and failed PED tests. And made excuses ... always trying to lift Whyte up by BASHING WILDER.

And you have no idea how to talk impressively about Whyte without mentioning Wilder. Because you've used Wilder to pump up Whyte for years.

You literally can't post about Whyte without BASHING Wilder.

People can talk about Wilder for days on end and never even mention Whyte.

For Whyte fans, it's all about Wilder.

Whyte Wilder Whyte Wilder.

 

That's awesome. You should stop caring about Wilder, too. And stop bringing him up every time you mention Whyte.

Look at this as an intervention.

We're all here to help you. No judgements. (LOL)

 

Seriously? You aren't looking at this objectively.

For example, Weaver was a BUM for John Tate. An easy defense. A guy who had 9 losses in 30 fights, including losses to Howard Smith (twice), Duane Bobick, Rodney Bobick, Billy Ryan, Larry Frazier, Leroy Jones, Stan Ward and Larry Holmes. Then he knocks out Tate with 45 seconds left in a fight where he lost nearly every round, and now Weaver's suddenly better than anyone Wilder ever fought, apparently?

Had Wilder lost to the 32-2 Johann Duhaupas in his second defense, for example, and Duhaupas made one defense knocking out Helenius, and then the 34-2 Duhaupas lost to a juiced Povetkin or a juiced Miller, and juiced Povetkin or juiced Miller became WBC champ ... and then Povetkin lost the belt to Joshua, and Joshua lost the belt to Ruiz, and Ruiz lost the belt back to Joshua ... how the hell would that be any different than what was going on in the 1980s?

The answer is it wouldn't be different at all. They just passd it back and forth. That didn't make them all great. The idea is not to lose it when you're supposed to win.

And, unlike those alphabet boys then and now, Wilder didn't lose to guys like that. He stopped them.

You are just in WILDER BASH mode.

So this isn't the day. But I'd be glad to discuss it at a later time, when you guys quit frothing at the mouth of his loss.

 

There's always August. And a second shot at the WORLD heavyweight title.

Maybe Anthony Joshua will get around to fighting Kubrat Pulev by then?

Hey, maybe Hearn will put Logan Paul on as the co-feature (or the MAIN EVENT). Maybe Joshua could fight Logan Paul after Pulev?

That's sort of the trajectory Matchroom is going now, right?

I'll stick with Fury-Wilder III in August. Thanks.

 

You've fallen off the wagon in minutes. Your sickness is worse than I thought.

 

The WBC "interim" belt was so heavy, Whyte needed PEDs to lift it. Ba-dum-boom. I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitress.