Yeah.. and Cintron is still better than Margarito. And Mosley is still better than Cotto. And Katsidis is still better than Casamayor. Why fight the fight? Even if you beat my ass I'm still #1. Baileys_tunes: you're a fruit.
the reason i say it is because joe didnt really win, hopkins controlled the fight, tied him up landed better punches, he got the better of joe throughout the whole fight.. Hopkins got the better of joe, joe didnt get the better of hopkins i trully believe that.. hopkins scooled him ffs, joe was out of his comfort zone and didnt have no answers for B-hop Joe won yea.. but he didnt really prove he was the better fighter, unless you prefer slaps
Hopkins is 43 and owned Joe whos supposed to be p4p no3 one of the best fighters of this era, he was knocking him about with ease.... and hopkins is shot as much as he looks sharp and in tact hes shot
Tell you what, why don't you give BoxRec a call and quote the following: ...then let's see if they see the light and change the result "because Baileys_tunes from ESB said so".
Son, you believe Hopkins Hype. He grabbed more than Ruiz, fouled, and moaned like a little ***** when he got fouled back. Anyone who believes this **** about Hopkins giving some type of old school lesson needs to learn more about the sweet science
With your posts on this thread you have proved to anyone who bothers to read this shite that you have no credibility whatsoever. EDIT: It says on your profile that you are 18. Maybe it's your hormones.
im telling you how it is...... hopkins was the better boxer, done the better work.. joe won a messy SPLIT decision, he looked like crap doing it... you cant understand it, your thinking "yea but joe won so he must be the better boxer"..... nah not at all, hopkins was the better boxer, joe couldnt find any way to beat him so he just jumped him done a ricky hatton, got an ugly win
I just looked at baileys profile To ring us back to reality, you are arguing with an 18 year old kid. He has some years to learn, bless him