Lucas Brown just had a test is now clean

The fight was rightfully postponed but should now be back on.

 

I agree with this. Bottom line this is career high purses for both men, the fight has been brewing for two years and 0.07 nano grams of an over the counter medication that doesn't even need a prescription to be bought is not enough to cancel a major sporting event. I would feel the exact same way if Wilder tested for it and I'm not a fan of his. They postponed the tests are now clean if WBC wants to implement a fine that's ok I'm my book. But I believe with the evidence I've seen so far this fight should take place.

 

This. :good

 

POOvetkins B sample was reported on Espn.com as a failed test. Where did you get that it was negative?

 

They were both positive. A and B sample is the same sample it's just the urine is divided into two different collections in case one is accidently tampered with or filed incorrectly. Both were positive but it's not like he relieved himself once comes back the next day and does so a second time. 99.9 percent of the time an A and B will match

 

Lmao...

 

Bang on. Process was done correctly, but now it's clear that what Povetkin was saying the whole time adds up.

Almost dodged that Wilder

 

Old limited Browne roided up to beat an even older Chagaev, laughable.

 

Rigged. Browne was clean like, 4 days before the fight. Rigged ****.

 

Yea, there's not much to debate about Clen. Below is Browne's sentiment.

http://www.*****.net/2016/05/25/new...wne-lawyer-leon-margules-plans-wba-court-case

Now look at Alberto Contador's sentiment.

They both sound the same. The result for Contador?

Btw, the one issue with Povetkin is that they (WADA) don't have data on how long the drug stays in your system. That's the one debatable point for him.

 

Based on biased claims from Team Browne. Until independent bodies substatantiate such claims based on evidence, he's a cheat.

 

This. History has shown that the bad meat excuse does not work with Clenbuterol. Until he proves he was spiked/poisoned, he's got no case. Why is he suing the the WBA not the Russians?

 

Exactly. There is no sound scientific proof to ban Povetkin at this point. He might be guilty, but we don't know that for sure at this point. In dubio pro res.