Lucas Matthysse Vs. Terence Crawford @ 140: Who Wins and How?!

Yeah, okay.

Just like how he was supposedly a easy stylistic matchup against Garcia. We saw what happened there. :yep

According to Matthysse nuthuggers, he's a stylistic matchup for anyone and the funny thing is, he's never been world champion in this watered down era :nod

 

Crawford would win by decision...don't think it would be easy work though.

 

I think Crawford tears him up starting around round 4 getting a UD.

 

Need to see Crawford in with a top guy at 140 before making a fair prediction.

 

Crawford can win. As long as he doesn't get caught.

 

They jump behind any undefeated Al Haymon fighter.

 

Haymon has nothing to do with anything. I don't like every Haymon fighter. I like Danny because he came up the hard way very little hype on the way up and he upset some good boxers along the way. People like you do hate on every Haymon fighter and Haymon though.

 

Garcia is a bum.

 

Stylistically, Crawford has the edge but Matthysse is a proven 140 fighter whereas Crawford is not so until I see Crawford face some top fighter in that division I'll just say I don't know.

 

Crawford's chin isn't granite. BumBoa shook him up. If he gets caught by Lucas it could be over quickly.

 

This will be a very hot topic once Matthysse decapitates Postol. Lucas vs Crawford and Kovalev vs BadBiev might be the best fights of 2016.

 

Garcia didn't outbox Matthysse but he has a great chin. Crawford doesn't and he isn't going 12 with Matthysse.

He has only had one title shot, Garcia.

 

Based on what? How many times has Crawford been knocked down or stopped in his career?:deal

 

Crawford is waaaaaaaaay better boxer than mathysse. I would put my vcash on Crawford, no doubt at all.

 

Little man Gamboa, a blown up junior featherweight hurt him. Matthysse wrecks him.

Don't worry Arum will ensure you never get the opportunity.